Skip to content Skip to footer

McConnell Is Holding Up the Senate to Protect the Filibuster

As minority leader under Obama, Mitch McConnell weaponized the filibuster to stymie the president’s legislative agenda.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell after the inauguration of President Joe Biden on January 20, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

Democrats are shooting down an effort by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to protect the Senate filibuster as part of a power-sharing deal with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. The modern filibuster maintains that passing a bill in the Senate requires 60 votes, which allows whichever party is the minority to block bills that the opposing party is trying to pass.

Schumer and McConnell met on Tuesday to hammer out the details of running a 50-50 Senate, which would usually produce a power-sharing resolution on logistics, so McConnell’s request to protect the filibuster is a step outside of what the meeting usually entails. The request has been reportedly dragging out their talks, leaving the Senate in limbo.

With the new Democratic majority in both chambers of Congress and a Democrat in the White House, many in the party have been excited to pass policies that have been obstructed, one way or another, in past years by Republicans. Though Democrats hold the majority now, the filibuster is still a hurdle to getting bills passed. So Democratic lawmakers are frustrated by this request from McConnell, who is seemingly indicating his intention to block Democratic bills right out of the gate.

“McConnell is threatening to filibuster the Organizing Resolution which allows Democrats to assume the committee Chair positions. It’s an absolutely unprecedented, wacky, counterproductive request,” Brain Schatz (D-Hawaii) tweeted. “We won the Senate. We get the gavels.”

“So after Mitch McConnell changed the Senate rules at a blistering pace during his 6 years in charge, he is threatening to filibuster the Senate’s organizing resolution unless the Democratic majority agrees to never change the rules again,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut) on Twitter.

Progressives have been advocating for abolishing the filibuster as it has become clear over the years that Republicans will block any progressive sounding policy, such as taking definitive action on the climate crisis. Many say that the only way for Democrats to get big, pressing agenda items done will be to implement a simple majority vote, requiring 51 votes, rather than the supermajority that the filibuster requires now.

The recent scuffle with McConnell has led progressives like Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) to re up their calls to abolish the filibuster. More centrist Democrats have demurred on the issue. President Joe Biden opposed it initially during his campaign last year but turned around partially after pressure from progressives.

For some, the issue isn’t necessarily partisan but rather about democracy: The filibuster did not always exist, and it’s only become more and more weaponized since its introduction in the early 1900s. In the early days of the filibuster, the Senate only had to vote about once a year to end it, according to Vox. Since 2010, it has taken the Senate an average of 80 votes per year to do the same.

“The filibuster has turned the Senate from an institution in which bills passed when a majority of senators support them to an institution in which bills can only pass, with rare exceptions, with the backing of a 60-vote supermajority,” Vox explains. “And since 60-vote supermajorities are exceedingly rare in the Senate, the result is that the Senate has lost the ability to routinely pass legislation, solve problems, and deliver the solutions Americans vote for.”

Historically, the filibuster has been used to stymie civil rights bills, MSNBC pointed out: “The filibuster is an invention of a time when slaveholding Southern senators sought to turn their minority into a weapon…. The practice became an art form for Republicans under Minority Leader Mitch McConnell” in the Barack Obama years. Ten years ago, one of the nation’s last best bets for climate policy, for instance, was destroyed partially by the filibuster.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy