House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s (R-California) plot to appease the most extremist lawmakers in his caucus by removing Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota) from her committee assignment is teetering on the edge of failure as more Republicans voice their reluctance to go along with the plan.
On Friday, Republican Rep. Ken Buck (Colorado) said that he is opposed to removing Omar, joining fellow Republican representatives Nancy Mace (South Carolina) and Victoria Spartz (Indiana). With McCarthy’s voting margin down to only three votes, with one Florida Republican on medical leave, it’s possible that their three votes will be enough to block McCarthy’s plan.
Democrats officially placed Omar in the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Friday, but McCarthy has vowed to remove her from the committee, with a vote on the matter expected this week. Though McCarthy can unilaterally remove people from select committees, like he did with California Representatives Adam Schiff (D) and Eric Swalwell (D), who were removed from the House Intelligence Committee, removing someone from a standing committee like Foreign Affairs requires a majority vote from the full House.
The issue puts McCarthy’s slim margin on full display, especially as a couple of other Republicans, Representatives David Valadao (California) and Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania), also appear to be unsure on how they will vote. Democrats are likely to stand behind Omar and vote “no,” per Axios.
Omar, one of the first Muslim women to serve in Congress, has repeatedly said that the attacks against her are politically motivated and fueled by Islamophobia. On Friday, she pointed out the hypocrisy of Republicans accusing her of antisemitism to remove her from committees while refusing to take action against real threats of violence from their own caucus.
“McCarthy did nothing when [Rep. Marjorie] Taylor Greene said Muslims don’t belong in our government. He did nothing when Boebert said I was a terrorist. He did nothing when MTG wanted [Rep. Rashida Tlaib] and I kicked out of Congress unless we swore in on a Christian Bible. Spare me the GOP hypocrisy,” Omar wrote on Twitter.
“[Donald] Trump dined with Nazis, said ‘Jews have to get their act together,’ and said to a group of Jewish leaders, ‘You’re brutal killers. Not nice people at all. But you have to vote for me; you have no choice.’ He never apologized,” she continued. “McCarthy is following a well worn playbook: pit minority groups against each other in order to further marginalize them. It has been used by demagogues throughout history and it won’t work.”
Republicans have falsely claimed that Omar is antisemitic in order to justify removing her from committees, ignoring statements from Jewish groups who say that it is actually Republicans, not Omar, who are condoning and perpetuating antisemitism.
In past years, Omar has spoken out against the Israeli occupation of Palestine, pointing out the influence of lobbying groups like AIPAC. Though human rights advocates and Jewish groups have said that opposing Zionism is not inherently antisemitic, pro-Israeli occupation groups like AIPAC have worked to equate supporting Palestinians to antisemitism — a narrative that Republicans and some mainstream Democrats have latched onto as an easy attack against progressives.
These accusations of antisemitism come from figures who themselves perpetuate antisemitic hatred, as Jewish advocates have pointed out. By accusing people like Omar of antisemitism and comparing efforts to remove her from committees to Democrats’ blocking of people like Greene, Republicans are drawing false equivalencies between Omar’s actions and those of the far right while drawing attention away from the party’s ties to virulent antisemites.
“Leader McCarthy’s pledge seems especially exploitative in light of the rampant promotion of antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories by him and his top deputies amid a surge in dangerous right-wing antisemitism,” a coalition of Jewish groups wrote in a statement last month.
“He posted (and later deleted) a tweet charging that George Soros and two other billionaires of Jewish descent were seeking to ‘buy’ an election,” the groups continued. “His newly elected Whip Tom Emmer said the same people ‘essentially bought control of Congress.’ Meanwhile, Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik has promoted the deadly antisemitic ‘Great Replacement’ conspiracy theory.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.