Skip to content Skip to footer

McCarthy’s Concessions to MAGA Diehards Have Paved the Way to Brutal Austerity

McCarthy has signed too many promissory notes, and now there are too many liens on his speaker’s gavel.

U.S. House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy speaks during his weekly news conference, June 25, 2020 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.

At the start of January, Kevin McCarthy’s difficulties in cobbling together a House majority to support his bid to become speaker produced endless comedy fodder for the late-night shows. Fourteen times, McCarthy went up for election. Fourteen times he lost.

With each loss, each humiliating reminder that one had to look back to the pre-Civil War days to find a speaker’s election this drawn-out, McCarthy ceded more ground to the extremist faction of his party. At first, he was unwilling to countenance the idea of a minority of congressmembers being able to trigger a new vote for House speaker; then he negotiated down to accepting that five or more members could force a vote; finally, he crossed his own redline on the issue and gave away the House — quite literally — by agreeing that a single member could torpedo a House speaker by calling for a new speakership contest.

On the 15th vote, McCarthy finally won, after six of his opponents, having been personally courted by Donald Trump, voted “present” instead of casting votes for others — meaning that he won without a majority of all the members voting for him — but he did so only by ceding a staggering amount of power to extremists. He grabbed the gavel, his gleeful face that of a kid in a candy store, but that gavel was now in splinters. And even those splinters, McCarthy had to admit, had only been his to grab because of Trump’s entreaties. No wonder that Trump, while he was president, condescendingly referred to McCarthy as “my Kevin.” No wonder, too, that by week’s end McCarthy was discussing the idea of legislation to “expunge” Trump’s two impeachments; if he did push this, it would be an utterly extraordinary rewriting of the historical record by a GOP leadership that has now entirely made its peace with the insurrectionary acts of January 6.

Once the levee had been breached on the notion that a single member could trigger another vote for speaker, it was no surprise that a flood would follow. Sure enough, the demands regarding new House rules came pouring in — rules that would gut the ability of the House to investigate its own via ethics committees; rules promoting a series of rolling investigations not only into Biden and his family, but also into the most basic law enforcement and judicial institutions of government; rules making it harder to raise taxes and easier to cut them; rules gutting funding for the Internal Revenue Service; rules encouraging legislation that would turbo-charge fossil fuel extraction in the U.S.; rules making it harder to increase funding for mandated programs such as Social Security and Medicare; rules forcing a vote every time the government wanted to increase its borrowing power — making it far more likely that, at some point down the road, the right wing of the GOP could walk the U.S. to, and perhaps beyond, the edge of debt-default as a way to force the government to cut spending on social services, on welfare, on education, on environmental policy, and other areas that have long been in the GOP’s crosshairs.

McCarthy, who had forfeited all of his bargaining strength once it became clear that he would ultimately accept the idea of a single solitary member being able to blackmail the speaker by threatening to call a leadership election unless his or her demands were met, quickly fell into line, as did the rest of the chastened GOP leadership in the House. By midweek, he had whipped his members to support the new rules package; and, reluctantly, the more moderate representatives fell into line and, almost to a person, voted for rules that, in their hearts, many must have realized were deeply counterproductive.

Thus were sown the seeds of the McCarthy speakership’s destruction. If McCarthy tries to embrace any sort of bipartisan legislation, individual congressmembers, such as Matt Gaetz, Andy Biggs, Paul Gosar or Lauren Boebert, can immediately — and repeatedly — hold his feet to the fire by triggering what would essentially be recall votes against him. Even if they don’t win these votes, the MAGA-diehards, most of whom came into office from 2016 onward with the express intention of destroying existing governing institutions, can entirely sabotage the functioning of Congress by swamping it with frivolous leadership contests. These would be similar in intent to Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), usually libel or defamation claims brought by corporations against social justice activists, journalists and watchdog groups, and aimed not at ultimately securing judicial wins but at wasting huge amounts of the advocates’ time, money and resources.

On the other hand, if McCarthy preemptively caves to the MAGA wing of his party on vital governance issues such as refusing to raise the debt ceiling, at some point enough enraged moderates, from groups such as the Problem Solvers Caucus, will peel off to allow the Democrats to start setting a legislative agenda of their own, or to at least protect the U.S.’s good credit; and, if McCarthy still stands in the way — behavior that would be utterly irresponsible, yet entirely in keeping with his shameful willingness to countenance anything, even Trump’s role in the January 6 insurrection, so long as it helps pave his way to power — that single member provision will hold just as good for the moderates as for the extremists.

It is, quite simply, a circle that cannot be squared. McCarthy’s power is, now, the power of the doomed. His job is held at the mercy of antagonists some of whom loathe him for being too “moderate,” others of whom loathe him for his craven capitulation to the demands of the far right, and all of whom correctly understand that he is a man of no principles, a hired hand for sale.

Will McCarthy last 24 months, or six, or even two? He has already signed too many promissory notes, and in consequence there are too many liens on his speaker’s gavel. McCarthy has the single thing that he has always craved: the luster of power. Yet his is a pyrrhic victory, for to attain it he handed all real political force and leverage to the MAGA-diehards.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.