Conservative coal baron Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) announced on Wednesday that he plans to oppose every nominee for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from President Joe Biden over an upcoming proposal aimed at addressing the climate crisis by requiring emissions cuts from coal and fossil gas power plants.
This week, the EPA is planning to unveil proposals for rules that would place new limits on the amount of greenhouse gasses that power plants are allowed to emit. If implemented, the rules could help the U.S. take a step toward Biden’s goal and climate experts’ recommendations to reduce emissions from 2005 levels by 50 percent by the end of the decade to have a chance at limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
Some people familiar with the proposal say that plants may need to rely on the use of carbon capture technology to meet emissions reductions requirements. Carbon capture technologies, which are often backed by Big Oil, have historically underperformed at the goal of reducing carbon emissions and have helped to prop up the profits of the fossil fuel industry.
The proposal would be one of the very few moves that Biden has taken so far to address the climate crisis while in office, with the president having chosen to break his climate pledges more than he has chosen to uphold them.
Nonetheless, Manchin, a longtime foe of those wishing to maintain a liveable climate on earth, has come out strongly against the proposal, the details of which have not yet been unveiled.
In a statement proudly entitled “Manchin to oppose every EPA nominee,” the right-wing Democrat criticized the attempt to draw down greenhouse gas emissions. He said that it was part of the administration’s “radical climate agenda” (that climate advocates say has yet to materialize) to “eliminate coal today or in the near future” (which climate advocates say is a worthy climate goal that the new proposal would, nonetheless, not come close to doing on its own).
Manchin, the chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, called the EPA’s regulation of climate emissions an “overreach” and said, without evidence, that the administration is moving to “kill the fossil industry by a thousand cuts.” The EPA is mandated by law to regulate power plant emissions under the Clean Air Act.
The EPA responded that it is not backing down in response to Manchin’s threat. “[W]e have been clear from the start that we will use all of our legally-upheld tools, grounded in decades-old bipartisan laws, to address dangerous air pollution and protect the air our children breathe today and for generations to come,” the EPA said in a statement.
Manchin has been resisting even the mildest climate-related moves from the Biden administration, due in part to his deep ties to the fossil fuel industry, as well as his own personal financial stake in coal.
He threatened to sue the administration in March over its interpretation of electric vehicle tax credits qualifications under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which he has also threatened to vote to repeal. And, in November, he snapped back at Biden after the president suggested that wind and solar energies could be replacing coal — which has been declining on its own, even with government intervention to save it.
Legislatively, Manchin remains one of the only figures standing firmly between the U.S. and climate action. Last year, Manchin dealt the killing blow to a major climate package that Democrats were hoping to pass through the Senate, after spending months obstructing the bill’s package. Then, when he announced that he had come to an agreement with Democratic leaders on the IRA, which contained some mild wins for the climate movement, he insisted that Democrats also pass a huge pro-oil and gas proposal that climate advocates have had to organize to kill several times now.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re shoring up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy