West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin announced on Monday he would support pro-union legislation that passed the House of Representatives last month, clearing the first of many obstacles that still remain toward its eventual passage in the Senate.
“I am pleased to announce that I am co-sponsoring the PRO Act,” Manchin said while speaking during a virtual event put on by the National Press Club.
“I look forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to move this bill through a legislative process,” he added.
In other comments about the bill, Manchin noted that “50 percent of unions fail in their first year of organizing.”
“This legislation will level the playing field,” the senator said.
Manchin’s decision to support the passage of the PRO Act allows it to clear a huge hurdle, as the centrist’s views on the bill weren’t clear before Monday. There are other Democrats, however, who have not yet stated where they stand on the matter.
Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema, both Democrats from Arizona, have not yet signed on as co-sponsors for the legislation. Nor has Sen. Mark Warner (D-Virginia).
Both Kelly and Warner may be facing conflicts of interest owing to their having received campaign contributions from Amazon — Kelly has received more than $139,000 from the company, while Warner has received almost $45,000. Amazon successfully fended unionization efforts at its facility in Bessemer, Alabama, earlier this month, using questionable means that would be deemed illegal if the PRO Act became law.
Under the provisions found in the PRO Act, an employer would be prohibited from interfering in union elections, and would not be allowed to require workers to attend anti-union meetings put together by the company — two tactics that Amazon used in order to defeat the unionization vote in Bessemer. The bill also creates financial penalties for companies that violate labor laws and rules, allowing the federal government more enforcement tools to prevent anti-union actions.
The bill has many other pro-worker provisions, including overriding so-called “right-to-work” laws in states across the country that allow workers in union-represented jobs to undercut the union by opting out of paying dues (while still reaping the benefits won for workers in those jobs). The bill also recognizes the rights of independent workers, including those in the so-called “gig economy,” to unionize.
There remain other obstacles, however, beyond some Democratic lawmakers not yet voicing their support for the bill. While a 50-vote threshold would allow Vice President Kamala Harris to cast the tie-breaking vote for the PRO Act, the threat of a filibuster may result in Republicans in the Senate successfully blocking the bill from being passed.
Efforts to bypass the filibuster, such as including the bill as part of an amendment to a law that was passed through reconciliation, may also fail, as the Senate parliamentarian may not agree that the legislation is a legitimate amendment related to the pandemic economic relief that was passed in March.
Still, Manchin’s decision to sign on to the PRO Act is a significant step, demonstrating that anything is possible at this point, and that things are moving in a positive direction for Democrats, for the time being at least.
If passed by the Senate, President Joe Biden has signaled he will sign the bill into law. “I believe every worker deserves a free and fair choice to join a union — and the PRO Act will bring us closer to that reality,” Biden said last month.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 4 days to add 310 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.