On Wednesday, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) told far-right publication The National Review that he wants the anti-abortion Hyde Amendment to be included in the Democrats’ Build Back Better Act. The statement comes as the lawmaker is making a series of demands that contradict the Democratic agenda for the reconciliation bill.
“We’re not taking the Hyde amendment off. Hyde’s going to be on,” Manchin told the publication, when asked about Democrats’ plan to expand Medicaid. “It has to be. It has to be. That’s dead on arrival if that’s gone.”
The Hyde Amendment is a 45-year-old legislative provision that bars federal funds for programs like Medicaid from being used to pay for abortions. Reproductive rights activists have long decried the ban for being discriminatory and restricting abortion access, as it makes it harder for nonwhite and low-income people to receive an abortion.
Though the Hyde Amendment has been included in every congressional funding bill on a bipartisan basis since 1976, Democrats have recently reconsidered its inclusion. In July, the House passed a bill to fund the Department of Health and Human Services, among other agencies. This bill excluded both the Hyde Amendment and the Helms Amendment, which bars U.S. funds from being used to support abortion services in other countries. The Senate has yet to take up the legislation.
However, Manchin has continually been at the forefront of fights for the inclusion of the Hyde amendment in legislation. He backed an amendment to include the anti-choice ban when the Senate authorized the reconciliation bill, and in July sent a letter to the Senate and Senate Appropriations Committee leaders asking for the inclusion of the ban in this year’s funding bills.
The lawmaker has been on a rampage to water down the reconciliation bill, taking particular aim at climate proposals in the bill. His insistence over the Hyde Amendment could result in further antagonism from progressives in Congress, who are already bristling over his abstract, conservative demands for the bill during its most critical week thus far.
Manchin’s announcement comes at a particularly fraught time for abortion rights in the U.S. Progressives and Democrats have been scrambling to enshrine abortion rights protections into law as the Supreme Court threatens overturning Roe v. Wade after conservative justices’ decision to uphold a near-total ban on abortions in Texas.
On Thursday, progressive Representatives Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington), Cori Bush (D-Missouri) and Barbara Lee (D-California) gave powerful testimony about their own experiences with abortion in front of the House Oversight Committee. The committee was examining threats to abortion rights in wake of the Texas law.
Bush testified about her decision to have an abortion after being raped as a teenager and becoming pregnant. “I was 18. I was broke, and I felt so alone. I blamed myself for what had happened to me,” she said. “How could I make this pregnancy work? How could I, at 18 years old and barely scraping by, support a child on my own?”
Lee spoke of traveling out of the country to surreptitiously receive an abortion before abortion rights were protected by Roe v. Wade. “I was one of the lucky ones, Madam Chair,” she said, noting that many people are forced to have unsafe abortions.
“The Hyde Amendment from its inception was racist and discriminatory and aimed at people with low incomes and people of color,” Lee continued later in her testimony. She pointed to stories like that of Rosie Jimenez, the first person to die after Hyde was passed. Jimenez couldn’t afford the fee to go to a licensed OB-GYN for an abortion and got an infection from the unlicensed abortion that she received instead.
Though the Hyde Amendment allows for narrow exceptions like cases of rape, incest or a pregnancy that would cause death, abortion rights advocates say that the ban too often results in dangerous cases like Jimenez’s. Advocates also say that the ban forces some people to make difficult financial choices like forgoing utility payments to afford the medical procedure. Because of the racial and financial disparities that the Hyde Amendment enforces, progressives say that the ban further entrenches oppressive government forces.
“Bans on abortion coverage are driven by the same forces motivating state-sanctioned violence and even voting restrictions,” Destiny Lopez wrote for Truthout in August. “Each aims to control the lives of Black, Brown and other people of color, especially folks struggling financially.”
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $104,000 in one-time donations and to add 1340 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy