Federal officials have refused to publicly release information about the cost and scope of a planned Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) in Tennessee, even as the project moves toward the design and construction phase.
The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) has raised alarms about the scant details that have been revealed about the multi-billion dollar UPF project at the Y-12 National Security Complex. Last month, POGO wrote leaders on the House and Senate appropriations committees questioning both the cost and mission of the proposed facility, which would among other things manufacture components for nuclear warheads.
Since Congress approved the UPF project in 2005, costs have skyrocketed from $1 billion to potentially up to $19 billion, and delays have pushed the estimated completion back 12 years. The National Nuclear Security Administration is currently reevaluating the project, which will affect both the design and mission scope. POGO, as well as others, has criticized a “big box” facility and urged NNSA to consider moving operations to other buildings at Y-12 and in the complex and build a smaller facility if necessary.
Because of the uncertainty about the final design and scope of the UPF, last week’s announcement that Bechtel National Inc. was awarded a subcontract to handle the UPF design and construction raises some serious concerns. The National Nuclear Security Administration has not responded to requests from POGO for details about Bechtel’s role or updates on the cost and timeline for UPF completion.
Consolidated Nuclear Security (CNS)—the contractor that manages the Y-12 complex—declined to answer questions about the changed scope or updated costs for the project but stated that Bechtel National’s involvement was part of the prime contract between CNS and the Administration.
Bechtel, which happens to be CNS’s parent company, has more than 19 instances of misconduct involving site management, construction or design, most notably the Department of Energy’s Vitrification Plant at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
“We’re very concerned that the NNSA is keeping the public in the dark about this questionable project,” said POGO senior investigator Peter Stockton. “There has not been an updated cost estimate or timeline released to the public and there are still questions about what mission capabilities will be required of the proposed UPF. I don’t have much confidence that this project is going to get any better if Bechtel is involved and being supervised by one of its subsidiaries. ”
To read POGO’s letter to Congress.
To read POGO’s blog on the Bechtel contract.
Founded in 1981, POGO is a nonpartisan independent watchdog that champions good government reforms. POGO’s investigations into corruption, misconduct, and conflicts of interest achieve a more effective, accountable, open, and ethical federal government.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.