Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Labor Department Seeks to Protect Regulation From Red State Onslaught

The “Persuader Rule” is under assault in federal court, where several Republican-led states, are seeking an injunction against it.

The Obama administration is asking a federal judge to throw out a challenge brought by ten states against a new labor regulation that will force union busters out of the shadows.

Finalized in April by the Department of Labor, the “Persuader Rule” is under assault in federal court, where several Republican-led states, are seeking an injunction against it.

According to a brief filed last week, the department argued that the state interveners claims should be rejected, and the regulation preserved.

“The public interest would be undermined if the Court were to enjoin a rule that seeks to bring greater transparency to attempts to influence employees’ decisions about whether to organize and bargain collectively,” the filing reads.

The persuader rule clarified a portion of the 1959 Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), which required businesses to inform the public whenever they sought the help of an outside firm to squash an organizing drive.

It specifically closed a loophole in the interpretation of the law that allowed indirect union-busting assistance — such as the supplying of talking points, video materials, and brochures — to go unreported.

According to the AFL-CIO, roughly 82 percent of employers will seek help of an outside firm to thwart an organizing effort.

Texas and nine other states claim that the mandatory disclosures violate the Tenth Amendment by improperly overriding state laws affording protection to attorney-client communications.

“None of this information required to be reported falls within the traditional confines of the attorney-client privilege,” the government shot back in its filing.

DOL attorneys contended that disclosures required by the regulation — the identity of the firm providing assistance, the types of material provided in the campaign, the duration of the services — all exist outside the realm of protected communications.

The court has “repeatedly rejected attempts to extend the traditional protections afforded to privileged attorney-client communications to cover information not traditionally considered privileged, such as the basic fact of legal representation or the name of a client,” DOL stated.

Rather than “commandeer” state law, the persuader rule “only requires covered private entities to disclose information under prescribed circumstances,” the briefing noted, countering the states’ Tenth Amendment arguments.

The lawsuit was initially filed in March by five business groups, including the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). In May, the court allowed Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Michigan, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin to join the plaintiffs in seeking an injunction.

Republican in Congress are working on a parallel track against the persuader rule. A GOP-led House labor subcommittee convened a hearing in April to discuss ways to undermine the regulations. Lawmakers have since put forward H.J. Res. 87 to use their authority under the Congressional Review Act to block implementation of the rule. The legislation was passed out of committee last month.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy