A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order on a far right organization that is harassing voters at ballot drop box locations in Maricopa County, Arizona.
The order issued by Judge Michael Liburdi, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, restricts Clean Elections USA (CEUSA) from openly carrying firearms near early voting locations. It also forbids the group and its members from taking photographs or videos of voters using drop boxes, from posting information about voters on the internet, and from continuing to spread lies about election laws.
The lawsuit was brought forward by the League of Women Voters, who described CEUSA’s actions in court filings as being “time-tested methods of voter intimidation.”
During a hearing on Tuesday prior to Liburdi’s ruling, CEUSA had agreed to stop openly carrying guns and wearing tactical gear near the locations and to stop harassing voters within 75 feet of drop boxes. But the group did not agree to stop photographing or filming voters or to stop posting their personal information online.
In addition to restricting these actions, Liburdi’s order requires CEUSA’s founder, Melody Jennings, to publish factual information about ballot drop boxes on her website and social media channels — including that “it is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box” and that Arizona law allows people to drop off “the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver.” Jennings and members of CEUSA have repeatedly asserted otherwise to justify harassing voters.
The group claims that intimidation is necessary to deter the depositing of ballots from so-called mules — individuals they falsely allege are stuffing drop boxes with illegal ballots in order to help Democratic candidates in statewide races. Notably, there is no proof of such actions anywhere in the U.S., and “2,000 Mules,” a pseudo-documentary film by Dinesh D’Souza that asserts that ballot stuffing took place in the 2020 presidential election, has been thoroughly debunked.
A lawyer representing CEUSA said that the group plans to appeal the ruling, claiming it violates their First Amendment right to free speech. As of Wednesday morning, Jennings has not complied with the judge’s order to publish factual information about voting on social media.
Though an appeal may be imminent, the ruling was lauded by the League of Women Voters, who said Liburdi’s decision would help voters to cast their ballots without the threat of intimidation.
“Today’s U.S. District Court decision is a victory for the voters of Arizona who have the right to cast their ballots free from intimidation, threats, or coercion,” said Pinny Sheoran, president of the League of Women Voters of Arizona. “The League of Women Voters of Arizona is proud to have challenged activities that are presently interfering with voters’ right to cast a ballot safely and without fear, and we encourage voters to continue using drop boxes to vote.”
The ruling on Tuesday comes just after a separate challenge that sought the same protections from CEUSA’s intimidation failed. That lawsuit, brought forward by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino, is currently being appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.