Skip to content Skip to footer

Jan. 6 Committee Makes First Request for Testimony From a Member of Congress

The first known request to a sitting member of Congress puts other Trump loyalists on notice that they may be next.

Rep. Scott Perry speaks at a news conference outside the Capitol Building on August 23, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

The House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the United States Capitol building has asked Trump loyalist Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pennsylvania) to provide documents and sit for testimony regarding the events of that day. This is the first known instance of such a request being made of a sitting member of Congress.

The January 6 commission announced on Monday that it was requesting information from Perry relating to his ties to the events of that day when a mob of loyal followers of President Donald Trump violently breached the Capitol building to disrupt the certification of the 2020 presidential election.

Perry indicated on Tuesday that he would not comply with the commission’s request. In his statement announcing his decision, he made clear that he did not respect the authority that the commission had in examining the events that led up to the Capitol attack.

“I stand with immense respect for our Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the Americans I represent who know that this entity is illegitimate, and not duly constituted under the rules of the US House of Representatives,” Perry said in a tweet.

Perry, himself a staunch devotee of the former president, was also asked to appear before the commission to discuss his involvement in a scheme to replace then-acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen (who refused to entertain Trump’s false claims of election fraud), with Jeffrey Clark, a Department of Justice (DOJ) official who appeared willing to go along with Trump’s lies.

“We have received evidence from multiple witnesses that you had an important role in the efforts to install Mr. Clark as acting Attorney General,” a letter from the commission’s chair, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi), said to Perry.

Indeed, Perry was allegedly the one who reportedly helped Trump to connect with Clark in the first place. As The New York Times reported last week, Perry was considered the “de facto sergeant” who coordinated with others on the plan to replace Rosen with Clark. A previous report from Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee also noted that Perry’s role in Trump’s attempts to alter the election results was “particularly notable.”

According to The New York Times, Perry had also pressed Richard Donoghue, another high-ranking DOJ official who was skeptical of election fraud claims from Trump’s camp, to allow Clark to investigate the election. Perry told Donogue that he had compiled a dossier allegedly full of evidence of election fraud, which Clark could “do something” with.

Trump himself had tried to use the powers of the DOJ to help disrupt the certification of the Electoral College, messaging Rosen directly about the plot to do so.

“Just say that the election was corrupt + leave the rest to me and the R. Congressmen,” Trump said in a phone call to Rosen in December, according to Rosen’s notes.

In his letter to Perry, Thompson also noted that the commission had received evidence from other witnesses that Perry had sent messages to Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows regarding attempts to keep the former president in office — including some messages that were encrypted. (Meadows was found in contempt of Congress earlier this month for his refusal to testify before the January 6 commission regarding documents he had already shared.)

The commission chair told Perry they had planned to discuss these matters and more with Clark, but that Clark had invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

“When Mr. Clark decided to invoke his 5th Amendment rights, he understood that we planned to pose questions addressing his interactions with you, among a host of other topics,” Thompson wrote.

The request from the commission for Perry to provide documents and testify before investigators is not a compulsory one — Perry isn’t currently being subpoenaed, and he can reject the request at this time. However, it indicates that the commission could make similar requests in the future, possibly through subpoenas, to other members of Congress regarding their knowledge and involvement in the attack on the Capitol and the attempts to keep Trump in office, despite his clear loss to Joe Biden in the 2020 elections.

The commission is asking Perry to meet with them sometime in the last week of December or in the first two weeks of January. Investigators can meet with Perry in Washington, D.C., at the Capitol itself or in his home district, whichever he prefers, the letter said.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy