It is still possible to take the bus from Beirut to Raqqa, the Syrian city just east of Aleppo that is now the de facto capital of the Islamic State. The journey once took seven hours, but it now takes a minimum of 20, due to roads destroyed by clashes and dozens of checkpoints from the trifecta of the Syrian regime, al-Nusra and the Islamic State. According to accounts from those who have recently made this journey, there are still some passengers on the largely empty bus leaving from Beirut’s Charles Helou bus station every other day, provided that passengers don’t have cigarettes in their pockets and are prepared to obey modesty laws dictated by the Islamic State.
But civilian life is far from normal in Raqqa right now. First the US-led coalition to fight the Islamic State (ISIS) began pummeling the city, targeting fighters while also inadvertently killing several civilians. In recent weeks, the Russian military has launched airstrikes on the city, also – while allegedly fighting the Islamic State – causing several civilian casualties.
On November 15, French President François Hollande announced that France would launch airstrikes on the Islamic State, in retaliation for the now notorious ISIS-coordinated attack that left 129 dead and injured 350 in Paris on November 13. While some civilians living inside Raqqa support the international measures taken to drive the Islamic State from their city, the strikes nevertheless mean added chaos – and an additional danger – to their daily lives.
This week, the French airstrikes have reportedly killed 36 militants while avoiding documented civilian casualties. Meanwhile, Russian airstrikes have killed five civilians.
The Ascendance of ISIS in Raqqa
Before the Syrian uprising began, Raqqa was considered one of Syria’s most liberal cities. Located in one of the first regions to be completely liberated from regime control, the city demonstrated the potential of nation-building inside of Syria. Activists formed local councils, creating mutual aid networks and a vision for the future of Syria, after the downfall of Bashar al-Assad and the end of the war. However, when infighting tampered with their organizational tactics, Jabhat al-Nusra took advantage of the power vacuum to seize control of the governing institutions. This paved the way for ISIS to seize the city from al-Nusra in 2014.
Airstrikes have not meaningfully targeted Islamic State’s presence and have done little to loosen the repression inside Raqqa.
ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi declared Raqqa the capital of the “caliphate” and implemented a series of incentives that enticed foreign fighters to migrate and join the Islamic State. Meanwhile ISIS made it more and more difficult for Syrian civilians who had once called the region their home to live. Newly recruited ISIS fighters – referred to as mujihireen – have free electricity and health care. They are given subsidized rent and fuel prices, and skip to the front of the line in bread queues.
For locals, it has been a different story entirely. Prices for basic goods have skyrocketed during the war economy, leading to a class divide between the mujihireen and the locals that leaves many financially struggling. Internet is expensive, and communications are monitored – meaning that there is a strong fear of surveillance and of speaking out. Journalists have been formally banned, and activists who share information about the Islamic State have been targeted and killed, on both the Syrian and Turkish sides of the border.
Culturally, life in Raqqa is different, as well. While women once were an integral part of the local councils, experimenting with the future of governance in the city, now they are not allowed to be in public without a male guardian and are forced to wear the full burqa, covering their faces as well as their bodies.
The “ISIS Stronghold” Holds Civilians Too
Over the past week, international media have been quick to refer to Raqqa as the “ISIS stronghold.” While technically true, this framing ignores the presence of the 300,000 Syrian civilians who have not pledged allegiance to the Islamic State and now live in the crossfire of a multifront international war involving ISIS, the Assad regime, the US-led coalition, Russian airstrikes and now French retaliatory airstrikes.
Meanwhile, members of Raqqa is Being Silently Slaughtered, a network of Syrian media activists who report undercover on life inside ISIS-occupied Syria, reported that electricity in the entire northwestern part of the city was out, and ISIS fighters responded to the strikes by hiding in civilian buildings, endangering those on the ground.
While symbolically welcomed by some civilians in Raqqa, the airstrikes have not meaningfully targeted Islamic State’s presence and have done little to loosen the repression inside Raqqa.
“The targets bombed by French warplanes were mostly abandoned by ISIS fighters,” an activist from Raqqa is Being Silently Slaughtered said on the condition of anonymity.
According to other accounts, ISIS fighters have abandoned their posts and are hiding in civilian buildings to avoid the airstrikes. Meanwhile, Russian airstrikes destroyed bridges and hospitals inside the city, targeting more civilians than militants.
“The US, Russia and France are all bombing Syria,” the activist added. “How many more countries want to bomb us?”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.