Abortion rights were explicitly on the ballot in multiple states in the 2022 midterms, and voters’ message on the subject was resounding: In red states, blue states and swing states, every proposal that aimed to restrict abortion rights has been rejected, and every measure to support abortion rights has passed.
Though some results are still trickling in, thus far every ballot initiative that has been decided has clearly revealed that voters not only support abortion rights, but will also show up to defend them. This is a significant victory, particularly in the wake of Roe v. Wade’s demise and the end of the constitutional right to an abortion.
If the midterms were a referendum on anything, it was abortion.
Polls show that a quarter of voters said that the overturning of Roe v. Wade was the most important factor in their vote, and 70 percent said it was an important factor to them. More than half of Democratic voters said the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization had a major impact on their voting choices. And those who voted for Democratic House candidates were more likely to say the Dobbs decision mattered in their vote. For a party facing what many pundits predicted would be a brutal thrashing, support for abortion rights proved to have a significantly ameliorating effect its candidates’ showing in the midterms.
In the first national election since the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade in June, abortion was sure to be an issue. As the results continue to trickle in, however, abortion will likely continue to reveal itself as the core issue of this election.
For the first time ever, abortion was on the ballot in five states — California, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana and Vermont. Voters in California, Michigan and Vermont all enshrined the right to an abortion into their state’s constitution.
In Kentucky, a traditionally conservative state, voters rejected a proposal that would have stripped the right to an abortion in the state; in doing so, they kept in place a barrier that prevents hostile legislators from potentially banning abortion entirely.
And though results in Montana are still coming in, it looks as though the state’s Referendum 131, which would have required health care providers to sustain infants born at any stage, even those that have no chance of survival, and which would lay the groundwork for fetal personhood in the state, is poised to be rejected as well.
Abortion is a winning issue –– the results from the abortion ballot initiatives bear that out. The Democratic Party, a party in control of the presidency, Senate and House, facing a historic midterm slump amid a media frenzy over an inevitable “red wave,” ran on abortion –– and its candidates didn’t get walloped.
Control of Congress still hangs in the balance, but the 2022 midterm election results have already defied historical precedent and an insistent media narrative that the out-of-power Republican Party was sure to dominate. Many factors likely contributed to Democrats outperforming predictions, including a spate of weak Republican candidates in key races, like Herschel Walker in Georgia and Dr. Mehmet Oz in Pennsylvania.
While it looks like Democrats may lose control of the House, they have a shot at gaining a Senate seat, a prospect that seemed unthinkable just a week ago.
Unfortunately, however, the midterm results won’t change much for abortion rights at the federal level. With the filibuster still intact in the Senate, the Democratic Party will still lack the ability to pass a bill codifying Roe v. Wade. For now, at least, abortion remains illegal across vast swaths of the country.
“Despite these wins, we can’t lose sight of the fact that abortion is unavailable in 14 states right now, including 12 states with abortion bans that have virtually no exceptions and 2 states where there are no clinics providing care,” said Elizabeth Nash, Principal Policy Associate at the Guttmacher Institute, in an emailed statement.
The horrifying post-Roe America is still a reality for folks who live in those states, and these results don’t change that. But the midterm results do change the landscape for pregnant people in Michigan, a state that faced the impending implementation of a 1931 abortion ban, an outdated law passed by the Michigan legislature amid the Great Depression that made abortion illegal in the state. Roe v. Wade overrode that ban and kept abortion legal in Michigan, until Dobbs overturned Roe. Now that voters have enshrined abortion rights into the state constitution and re-elected Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, who ran on abortion rights, the 1931 ban is dead. Abortion will remain legal in the state, and it will ease the burden on neighboring states like Illinois, which have become havens for abortion seekers from across the South and Midwest.
This midterm election offers a pathway forward in this unique moment of peril for abortion rights and for democracy more broadly. If the Democratic Party wants to win elections, it should run on abortion, but it also needs to act for abortion. Put abortion rights measures on the ballot in as many states as possible, including red states like Mississippi and Texas. Propose and advance legislation at the federal, state and local level that not only legalizes abortion, but also expands access and eradicates barriers such as the Hyde Amendment, which bars federal Medicaid funding of abortion care.
We won’t know the fate of Congress for a couple days, possibly even until the Georgia Senate run-off in December. At this point, however, regardless of who ultimately gains control of the House and Senate, legal abortion is the decisive winner. If Democrats want to keep running on abortion and ultimately winning, it’s well past time for them to deliver.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.