Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Immigration Advocates: “Enforcement First” Proposal Already a Reality

Border Patrol agents patrol the U.S. border with Mexico. (Photo: Jim Greenhill / Flickr)

Jose Adolfo Quinones Salazar is an undocumented immigrant from a town in the highlands of Guatemala. Tourist web sites advertise the principle crafts of the area as weaving, candle-making and ceramics, but Salazar, 30, says there are few jobs.

“I came to the United States to help my family for some money,” he said. “They are very poor.”

He has been in the US since 2004, when he crossed the Mexican/American border “like everyone else.” Since then, he’s worked a variety of constructions jobs and, he says, sent back money from every paycheck.

With a renewed interest in comprehensive immigration reform, many are celebrating the possibility that an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants like Salazar could have a pathway to legal residency.

He is hopeful about the prospect of reform. “It would be great if they could help us all get out of this situation.”

But for most undocumented workers who have come in contact with the immigration system, their first and only interaction has been with its enforcement arm.

Salazar was among a group of day laborers picked up last November in a raid by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He spent 21 days in an immigration detention center, and is now facing deportation. He insists he has no criminal record, but he also has no documents that grant him a legal presence in this country.

The past ten years have seen what the Immigration Policy Center has called “a sweeping and punitive transformation in US immigration enforcement” that has culminated in record expenditures and arrests.

Immigration enforcement is now more expensive than all other federal law enforcement programs combined, costing $187 billion since 1986, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

Meanwhile, in a second record-setting year, 2012 saw an unprecedented 409,849 deportations.

According to a Migration Policy Institute report released in April 2012:

The ‘enforcement-first’ policy advocated by many in Congress and the public as a precondition for considering broader immigration reform has de facto become the nation’s singular immigration policy.

Judging by resource levels, case volumes and enforcement actions which represent the only publicly available comprehensive measures of the performance of the system, immigration enforcement can thus be seen to rank as the federal government’s highest criminal law enforcement priority.

Despite this, both legislative frameworks put forward by the Obama administration and a bipartisan group of Senators still focus on heavy enforcement, and in the case of the Senators’ plan, a “secure border” before any path for legalization can begin.

The Obama administration’s skeleton plan calls for two key areas of enforcement. “First, continue to strengthen our borders. Second, crack down on companies that hire undocumented workers.”

This includes “mandatory, phased-in electronic employment verification,” and facilitating “public-private partnerships aimed at increasing investment in foreign-visitor processing.”

The proposal put forth by a bipartisan group of Senators said the trade-off for a path to citizenship would be to “continue the increased efforts of the Border Patrol by providing them with the latest technology, infrastructure and personnel needed to prevent, detect and apprehend every unauthorized entrant.”

Unmanned aerial vehicles, also known as drones, were a part of their proposal. “Additionally, our legislation will increase the number of unmanned aerial vehicles and surveillance equipment, improve radio interoperability and increase the number of agents at and between ports of entry. The purpose is to substantially lower the number of successful illegal border crossings while continuing to facilitate commerce,” the Senators’ proposal said.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 231 new monthly donors in the next 2 days.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy