Hybrid cars are obviously more efficient and more eco-friendly than conventional vehicles powered by gasoline, as they are powered by an electric motor, in addition to an internal combustion engine. The electric powertrain helps improve the car’s fuel economy, and reduce emission levels. This is why hybrids are considered to be a better option than conventional cars for those who want to save money on gas and help reduce air pollution. But, as with all other vehicles, hybrid vehicles’ fuel economy is not the same when driving in the city and on the highway. While gasoline-powered cars are more efficient on the highway, hybrids get better mileage and emit less harmful gases when driving in the city.
This is what a study that was recently conducted by Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Mellon University revealed. Researchers found that hybrid vehicles don’t provide too many benefits for the environment when driving on the highway, and they burn much more fuel than in urban areas. Jeremy Michalek, a professor of mechanical engineering and engineering and public policy at CMU, said: “We found that for highway drivers, hybrid and plug-in vehicles cost more without much benefit to the environment.” He went on to say: “But for drivers who experience a lot of idling and stop-and-go traffic, a hybrid could lower lifetime costs by 20 percent and cut greenhouse gas emissions in half.” This is mainly because of the electric motors that power hybrid vehicles, which are more efficient in stop-and-go traffic, thanks to the regenerative braking system. This is a system that helps recover the energy that is lost during stops. The system recaptures the energy and stores it in the car’s battery. This means that the more starts and stops a hybrid car makes, the more energy it recovers. The energy that is recovered can only give the car a couple of extra miles, which means that you can not complete your commute if the engine does not kick in and provide additional power.
What these findings suggest is that it will take much more time for hybrid vehicle owners who commute to work, to make up for the hybrid’s higher purchase price, than for those who live in an urban area and don’t need to get out on the highway to get to work. This a very important finding, considering that the average hybrid is significantly more expensive than the average gasoline-powered car, and many people buy hybrids because it allows them to save a lot of money on gas.
In addition to being less efficient, hybrids are also less eco-friendly on the highway. When traveling at higher speeds, their gasoline engine is activated, resulting in increased fuel consumption, and consequently, increased amounts of CO2 emissions that the car releases.
With all these facts in mind, it’s no surprise that fuel economy of most hybrids doesn’t improve on the highway, which is not the case with conventional cars that are much more fuel-efficient when they are out on the open road, moving at high speeds, avoiding those stop-and-go situations.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.