Four years ago, it was the turn of New York City to pick up the pieces after a bruising assault by the weather.
On the evening of 29 October 2012, Hurricane Sandy kept The City That Never Sleeps wide awake with 80 mile-per-hour winds and a record-breaking storm surge that caused widespread flooding.
Across the city, Sandy caused 43 deaths, damaged or destroyed hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses, and left millions without power. Much of the damage was a result of the storm surge the hurricane caused.
A new study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, says that a repeat of such a flood event could become as much as 17 times more likely by the end of this century.
Storm Surge
When a storm weather system is over the sea, its low pressure centre pulls up the surface of the water. Then, as the storm blows onto the land, the wind pushes the sea towards the coast, creating even higher sea levels and hitting the coastline with large waves. This is a storm surge.
In New York City, the combined impact of the storm surge and a high tide saw sea levels reach a record height of 3.44m during Sandy. The surge swept up the East River, causing it to overflow its banks and flood Lower Manhattan, inundating seven major subway tunnels.
The height a storm surge can reach is dependent on three main factors: the underlying sea level, the size and severity of the storm, and the natural fluctuations of the tide. The new study focuses on the first two of these.
The researchers built a computer model to estimate the likelihood of a Sandy-like flood event in New York City in the past, present and future climate. The model combines historical data and projections for sea level rise with estimates for how the frequency and magnitude of tropical storms — such as Hurricane Sandy — could change.
Between 1800 and 2000, the risk of Sandy-like flood heights increased around threefold, the researchers find. Back in 1800, New York might only expect to encounter such high sea levels once every 1,200 years, whereas by 2000, the likelihood increased to about once every 400 years.
This is partly down to a global sea level rise of around 13-18cm, but mainly because of a “glacial isostatic adjustment” of about 26-30cm, the study says. This is the ongoing rebound of land that was once weighed down by ice sheets during the last ice age.
For the future, the researchers project the frequency of Sandy-like flood heights is likely to rise “even more sharply” than it has in the past.
Under a moderate emissions scenario, rising sea levels and changing tropical storms mean that Sandy-like floods could be between three and 17 times more frequent by the end of the century, compared to present.
This would mean the residents of New York City could expect such high flood levels as often as every 23 years. Of course, we’re currently on a path of much higher emissions than this scenario.
Uncertainty
Whether tropical storms have been, or will be, made more frequent or intense by climate change is complicated and nuanced. Because hurricanes feed off warm waters, the theory goes that rising ocean temperatures have made — and will continue to make — hurricanes stronger. But pinpointing a trend has so far been hampered by poor data records.
In the North Atlantic, where most data is available, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded (pdf) that while it is unlikely that the annual count of tropical storms has risen over the last century, it is “virtually certain” that the frequency and intensity of the strongest hurricanes has increased since the 1970s.
Looking ahead, lead author Prof Ning Lin, assistant professor in civil and environmental engineering at Princeton University, says there is still uncertainty in climate models over how tropical storms will change. But it doesn’t mean the risks shouldn’t be considered, she tells Carbon Brief:
“Some models show that storm activity will increase and — based on these models — the change in storm activity should not be neglected as it would significantly add to the effect of sea level rise.”
Projections of how sea levels will rise are much more certain, says Lin, and this plays the biggest role in the increasing flood risk. Even if tropical storms don’t become more intense or frequent, the recurrence of Sandy-like floods is still expected to increase from once every 400 years in the year 2000 to once every 90 years by 2100.
Prof Kevin Trenberth from the US National Centre for Atmospheric Research, who wasn’t involved in the study, agrees that there is more certainty around future sea level change than for tropical storms.
Despite some reservations about the study being based predominantly on model results rather than observed data, Trenberth says that we can be fairly certain that coastal flood risk in New York will increase in future. He tells Carbon Brief:
“This is a useful study, although with many assumptions, that indicates an increasing risk of damaging storm surges along the East Coast, and that conclusion is likely fairly robust, because sea level will continue to rise.”
Making a definitive prediction of how Sandy-like flood events could change in future is difficult, but the benefits for protecting coastal cities are considerable, says Dr Andra Garner (née Reed), from Rutgers University, who authored a similar study last year. She tells Carbon Brief:
“Our ability to understand the frequency with which we can expect such an event to occur — and how and why that frequency may have changed in the past or may change in the future — is vital, as we adapt and plan to try to prevent the kind of damage seen with Sandy when future flooding events occur.”
And as New York beefs up its defences to prevent future flooding, this study can help engineers ensure that they’re planning for the right level of protection for the future, says Lin:
“New York has started the planning of building coastal protection defence. Our analysis can help determine what magnitude of such defence — e.g., height of levees — is needed to protect the city from future increasing surge inundation.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy