As the Obama era draws to a close, Black protest has resurfaced in a decisive way with the Black Lives Matter movement (BLM), which burst into national consciousness with the protests in Ferguson following the killing of Michael Brown in 2014.
Yet many commentators have criticized the Black Lives Matter movement for failing to emulate the nonviolent tactics and reconciliatory politics that supposedly characterized the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, for example, said the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. would be “appalled” by Black Lives Matter. Likewise, Sen. Ted Cruz suggested that the movement celebrates the killing of police officers, and Bill O’Reilly compared it to the Ku Klux Klan.
But not only would MLK not be ashamed of the Black Lives Matter protesters, he would be marching alongside them on the streets of Ferguson and Baltimore.
This critique of contemporary protests against police violence is based on a romanticized narrative of the 1960s civil rights protests, and on a misrepresentation of MLK’s politics and tactics. In contrast to the way he is remembered today – as an icon of racial reconciliation who perfected a model of Black protest that both Blacks and whites embraced – in the 1960s, MLK was branded an “outside agitator” and an “extremist.”
Indeed, King’s methods did not seek to evade confrontation. Instead, they were aimed at making visible the state-sanctioned violence through which segregation was upheld in the South by provoking poorly disciplined police forces to attack unarmed, nonviolent protesters. The connection between the 1960s civil rights protests and Black Lives Matter on this score is striking. The police officers in Ferguson who attacked protesters and responded with an over-the-top militarized response to citizens trying to force recognition of their rights were inadvertently repeating the events of Bloody Sunday in 1965 in Selma, when Alabama state troopers attacked unarmed marchers with billy clubs and tear gas. In fact, as the film Selma so powerfully showed, King was criticized at the time for putting Blacks at risk and courting violence. He was viewed as a “professional protester,” moving from city to city where Black protest was about to erupt.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.