Skip to content Skip to footer

House to Investigate DeJoy for Perjury Over Illegal GOP Fundraising Scheme

House Oversight Chair Rep. Carolyn Maloney said the postmaster general faces “criminal exposure” for lying under oath.

U.S. Postal Service Postmaster General Louis DeJoy arrives to testify at a House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing in the Rayburn House Office Building on August 24, 2020, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-New York), the chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, announced late on Monday that a formal investigation would commence into Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, after reports over the weekend detailed how he may have been involved in an illegal scheme to raise funds for Republican candidates for office.

Allegations into DeJoy’s conduct were first reported by The Washington Post, which revealed on Sunday that between 2003 and 2014, DeJoy may have reimbursed his employees for political contributions they made to GOP candidates by paying them back in the form of bonuses.

It is illegal to make such payment arrangements under both federal and North Carolina state law, where the alleged reimbursements took place. The accusations were made by David Young, who served as DeJoy’s human resources director at the time the supposed transactions took place.

Democrats in Congress have called on DeJoy to step aside from his role as postmaster general until the matter can be resolved and North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein has said that an investigation could be launched in his state.

“Any credible allegations of such actions merit investigation by the appropriate state and federal authorities,” Stein said.

On Monday evening, Maloney echoed Stein’s sentiments, announcing that the committee she chairs would begin an investigation into DeJoy’s actions. But the committee wouldn’t stop there, she added.

Maloney suggested that DeJoy also faces “criminal exposure” because he had denied engaging in such behavior during a congressional hearing last month. He is likely to face repercussions “for lying to our committee under oath,” Maloney said.

DeJoy’s boss, President Trump, tried to defend the postmaster general during a press briefing on Monday, prior to Maloney’s announcement. When asked about the allegations, Trump stated to reporters that he believed DeJoy was an “honest guy.” He also deflected the question by stating he wasn’t familiar enough with the reporting to make a statement on it.

“I don’t know exactly what the story is. I’ll certainly know within a short period of time. I just read it for the first time — I read it this morning, just like you did,” Trump said.

Pressed on whether he’d want DeJoy to lose his job if the allegations are proven true, Trump responded in the affirmative.

“If something can be proven that he did something, always,” Trump said. However, immediately after that question, the president launched into a tirade against investigations into his administration in a general sense, proclaiming that a friend had told him he was “the most innocent, honorable man ever” to be president.

Other lawmakers, however, have been less passive toward DeJoy’s alleged conduct than Trump was on Monday. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) urged North Carolina’s attorney general to launch a formal investigation into the postmaster general, to ensure a fair inquiry into the matter.

“These are very serious allegations that must be investigated immediately, independent of Donald Trump’s Justice Department,” Schumer added.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.