Skip to content Skip to footer

House Passes Watered-Down NSA Reform Bill

The bill, introduced by Rep. James Sensenbrenner, was modified in the House Judiciary Committee to remove some of the civil liberties protections in the original bill, but it retained a prohibition on the bulk collection of Americans’ telephone records.

This morning, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 303-121 to pass a heavily revised version of the USA FREEDOM Act. The bill, introduced by Rep. James Sensenbrenner, was modified in the House Judiciary Committee to remove some of the civil liberties protections in the original bill, but it retained a prohibition on the bulk collection of Americans’ telephone records. The House Rules Committee then further modified the bill to reflect changes that the Obama administration and House leadership desired. The changes substantially weakened the bill’s privacy protections and transparency provisions.

The following statement may be attributed to Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program:

“To call this a disappointment is an understatement. The president has publicly called for an end to bulk collection, and the House managed to forge a broad bipartisan consensus on a bill that would do just that. But behind closed doors, the administration worked to undermine the bill and eliminate the clarity it would have provided.

“The bill that came out of the judiciary and intelligence committees contained critically important language that would have ended the bulk collection of Americans’ telephone records and other types of data. By contrast, the version passed by the House is frustratingly ambiguous on this point.

“In particular, while the previous bill would have required any request for records to be tied to a clearly defined set of ‘specific selection terms,’ the bill that just passed leaves the definition of ‘specific selection terms’ open. This could allow for an overly broad and creative interpretation, which is something we’ve certainly seen from the executive branch and the FISA Court before.

“It’s particularly galling that the administration objected, in secret, to certain provisions that would have allowed companies to report more detailed statistics about government requests. In January, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the Senate Intelligence Committee that ‘the major takeaway’ from the Snowden disclosures was that ‘we must lean in the direction of transparency, wherever and whenever we can.’ Apparently this testimony was no more reliable than his flat denial in March 2013 that the NSA was collecting any type of data on millions of Americans.

“If the Senate wants to pursue meaningful NSA reform, it must restore the protections that were stripped out on the House side. The original USA FREEDOM Act remains the most promising and comprehensive attempt to protect Americans’ privacy.”

For more information or to set up an interview, contact Seth Hoy at [email protected] or (646) 292-8369.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.