The governors of North Carolina and Virginia want federal regulators to hurry up and approve seismic testing for oil and gas reserves along the Atlantic Coast – even though recent scientific findings have raised new concerns about increased risks to whales, dolphins and porpoises.
Last week Gov. Pat McCrory (R) of North Carolina and Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) of Virginia wrote a letter to U.S. Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker asking her to investigate why it’s taking so long for her agency’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to process applications to conduct seismic tests for offshore oil and gas deposits.
McCrory chairs and McAuliffe is a member of the Outer Continental Shelf Governors Coalition, a group of pro-drilling governors that’s run by oil and gas industry lobbyists. The Governors Coalition has been pressuring the Obama administration to open the area off the coast of Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia to oil and gas exploration and drilling.
The governors note that several seismic testing companies filed applications last year with NMFS to obtain what are known as Incidental Harassment Authorizations or IHAs, which allowthe “pursuit, torment, or annoyance” of marine mammals with the potential to injure them or disturb migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding or sheltering.
“Two IHA requests for seismic acquisition in waters off Alaska have been processed since that time, yet the NMFS has been slow in processing IHA applications for the Mid- and South Atlantic [Outer Continental Shelf],” McCrory and McAuliffe wrote. “Additional delays were created when a 30 day comment period was added to the application review process.”
The governors ask Pritzker to look into the processing of the applications “to determine the cause of any delays and ensure that IHA issuance is completed in a timely manner.”
Four companies have submitted applications to NMFS for IHAs related to Atlantic seismic testing: Spectrum Geo and ION GeoVentures, both of Houston; TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Co., a Norwegian firm with U.S. operations based in Houston; and TDI-Brooks International of College Station, Texas.
Seismic testing involves blasting loud airguns every 10 seconds, 24 hours a day, for days or weeks at a time – intense noise that can injure or even kill marine mammals and other ocean life. The federal government’s own estimates are that as many as 138,000 marine animals could be injured and another 13.5 million could have their behavior patterns disrupted by seismic testing, which has been proposed from Delaware to Central Florida, an area larger than that being considered for drilling.
Last month, an alliance of environmental groups sent a letter to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), the Department of Interior agency that regulates offshore drilling, alerting it to new data that calls into question its 2014 analysis that concluded seismic testing would have a negligible impact on Atlantic marine life. The environmental advocates pointed to new federal density models for whales, dolphins and porpoises that show the animals are present within the offshore exploration area in far greater concentrations than BOEM had anticipated.
Environmental advocates have also raised concerns that the NMFS is considering the four seismic testing permit applications it’s received without taking into account the additional four applications the BOEM is considering. Comments submitted to NMFS by the N.C. Coastal Federation point out that three of the four IHA permit applications propose seismic surveys in overlying areas and times and urge the agency to weigh cumulative impacts.
“The combined effect of several surveys occurring during the same time period, in the same general areas in the Atlantic, is an unknown variable that has not been adequately assessed,” the group wrote.
McCrory’s and McAuliffe’s letter does not mention any effects seismic testing might have on ocean life; its stated concern is that “the delays in the IHA process could jeopardize the timely acquisition of seismic data that will support informed decision-making by Mid-Atlantic states.”
The environmental advocacy group Oceana has launched an online petition criticizing McCrory for the letter. It accuses him of “racing our state and coastal communities toward disaster” and calls on him to “reverse course.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.