This week, Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin reiterated his goal of forcing teachers and school administrators to inform parents if their children are LGBTQ, under the banner of supporting so-called “parental rights.”
Youngkin’s comments have been condemned by education experts and LGBTQ advocates, who say that such a policy would intrude upon students’ privacy rights and endanger already vulnerable young people.
Currently, school districts in Virginia can make their own decisions on whether or not to inform parents about a child’s LGBTQ identity if it is shared with teachers or staff. Many districts have decided that such information shouldn’t be divulged without permission in order to protect students’ privacy rights and safety.
Last month, however, Youngkin appointed five new members to the State Board of Education, creating a conservative majority on the panel. On Tuesday, Youngkin spoke about policies the panel may choose to pursue — including requiring teachers to reveal personal information about students to their parents.
“With regards to informing parents with most important decisions about their children, I think everybody knows where I stand: parents matter,” Youngkin said. “I firmly believe that teachers and schools have an obligation to make sure that parents are well informed about what’s happening in their kids’ lives.”
Advocates condemned Youngkin’s comments as a threat to LGBTQ students across the state.
“No one should take this crucial discussion of ‘coming out’ away from the students and parents by ‘outing’ someone,” LGBTQ advocate Robert Rigby said. “It feels and is really intrusive and can be damaging to the parent/child relationship, sometimes permanently.”
Former state Delegate Jay Jones similarly blasted the idea, noting that Youngkin’s comments were especially hypocritical considering his faith.
“Imagine telling people you follow the teachings of Jesus — treating people with love and compassion — and then inducing immeasurable trauma on a child by forcing teachers to out them to their entire community,” Jones wrote on Twitter. “@GlennYoungkin’s idea of faith is hatred and persecution of children.”
Parenting experts agree that forcing children to disclose their sexual orientation or gender identity can be psychologically and physically harmful. Often, coming out to a teacher or a trusted school administrator is safer for a child who lives in a homophobic environment than coming out to their parents — and outing an LGBTQ youth can increase their chances of being abused or becoming homeless.
“Whether a student is coming out about their gender identity or sexual orientation at school, they are doing it because they likely feel safe and affirmed with those people, in that space,” wrote University of Colorado, Boulder, professor Elizabeth Meyer in a 2021 op-ed for Psychology Today. “It is also possible that they are not sure if they will be safe and affirmed if they come out in other spaces at school or at home. In some cases, they know quite clearly that they could be subject to violence, rejection, or even homelessness if their parents or guardians find out.”
Outing a child to a parent or guardian violates their privacy rights, Meyer said, including the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
“Until a child is 18, parents do have the right to review any official records maintained by the school, but [under FERPA] schools must not divulge ‘identifying’ information to anyone without a ‘legitimate educational interest,'” Myers said.
“It is imperative that when a student comes out at school, we respect their choices about who to tell and when. This means it cannot be our decision about who to inform,” she went on.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.