On Wednesday, Senate Republicans blocked a bill that sought to enshrine through statutory code the right for individuals to access contraception.
The right to contraception currently exists through judicial precedent, as the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized it in rulings like Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965 and Eisenstadt v. Baird in 1972. But following the Supreme Court’s overturn of federal abortion rights in 2022, many reproductive rights advocates have said there is a need for the right to be codified into federal law.
The Right to Contraception Act would protect a person’s right to “to seek and obtain contraceptives and engage in contraception, and to permit health care providers to facilitate that care,” according to the bill’s language.
The legislation had the support of a majority of senators, with 51 lawmakers in the chamber — mostly Democrats, joined by two Republicans — voting for its passage and only 39 Republicans voting against it. However, that vote wasn’t enough to defeat the 60-vote filibuster threshold, resulting in the bill’s ultimate defeat.
“Actions speak louder than words. And today, Senate Republicans made it perfectly clear that they won’t protect access to contraception,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) said on X after the vote.
Republican lawmakers suggested that the vote was election-year theater, put forward in order to embarrass them when the measure failed and not a true attempt by Democrats to pass a bill on reproductive rights.
“This is a show vote. It’s not serious. It doesn’t mean anything,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said, adding that he felt the bill was “overreach.”
Cornyn also stated that the bill wasn’t necessary because currently “contraception…is not illegal.”
But Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) rejected that narrative.
“Today was not a show vote. This was a show-us-who-you-are vote. And Senate Republicans showed the American people exactly who they are,” said Schumer.
Despite Cornyn’s claim, some members of his own Senate conference do reject the notion that contraception is a protected right, including Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee). After the vote, a video of Blackburn from 2022 resurfaced in which she claims that Griswold was a “constitutionally unsound ruling.”
Blackburn was among the 39 Republicans who voted against the Right to Contraception Act.
The judicial precedent protecting the right to contraception is not as shielded as Cornyn suggests it is, either. In his concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, which overturned federal abortion rights, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggested that Griswold should also be re-examined, noting that it was established nearly 60 years ago under some of the same rationales that Roe had been.
Contraception is under attack at the state level as well. In Oklahoma, for example, Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation that would ban emergency contraception and potentially forbid intrauterine devices (IUD) in the state. Several states have also blocked legislation that would enshrine contraception as a right in their own codes.
GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump has indicated that he would allow states to decide for themselves what laws on contraception they should have, including laws barring access to birth control.
“We’re looking at that, and I’m going to have a policy on that very shortly, and I think it’s something that you’ll find interesting,” Trump said in an interview last month, adding that contraception should be a “states’ rights” issue.
After facing enormous pushback, Trump walked back his comments, falsely claiming that Democrats had “fabricated” the position he had openly stated.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 275 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy