Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pennsylvania) blocked an attempt to protect stimulus payments from being seized by predatory debt collection agencies, after several Senate Democrats requested a vote of unanimous consent on the issue Thursday.
As part of the latest coronavirus economic relief package, every American under a certain income threshold is set to receive (or has already received) a $1,400 stimulus payment for themselves and for each dependent listed on their tax forms. But protections against collections agencies were not included in the final bill that reached President Joe Biden’s desk earlier this month, due to Senate rules regarding the reconciliation process.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and other Democrats had proposed a standalone bill on Thursday that sought to provide protections against debt collectors taking stimulus funds from Americans.
“The Senate will either stand today for the working families who desperately need this help … or the Senate is with private debt collectors, reaching their hands into those families’ pockets,” Wyden said in remarks on the Senate floor.
“We passed these checks to help families, to support families, to support local economies, not to line the pockets of predatory debt collectors,” Brown added.
Democrats had requested a vote of unanimous consent, a parliamentary procedure that allows quick passage of the bill without delay. However, Senator Toomey objected to the request, delaying the bill and making it likely that many Americans will see their stimulus checks garnished.
In voicing his objection, Toomey tried to place the blame on Democrats, arguing it was their fault that the bill didn’t include protections. Toomey also defended debt collectors, stating they had “valid legal claims” to take away people’s stimulus funds.
By refusing to pass the original stimulus bill with bipartisan support, Democrats were at fault for the present situation, according to the Republican senator. “That is the only reason that this provision couldn’t be addressed because it can’t be dealt with under the reconciliation rules,” Toomey said.
It’s possible that Republicans may end up using a filibuster to ultimately block the bill, once it comes up for debate later.
This is not the first time that a coronavirus stimulus package has failed to prevent debt collectors from seizing aid to Americans. After the CARES Act was passed last spring, debt collectors began removing funds from bank accounts. The Senate attempted to shield the checks from seizure — passing a unanimous consent bill like the kind Toomey now objects to, HuffPost reported. Unfortunately, the House of Representatives did not take up the bill, and debt collectors continued to collect funds from individuals’ bank accounts.
The December stimulus bill did include protections against debt collections, as it passed without the need for reconciliation.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy