Skip to content Skip to footer

GOP Lawmakers in 3 States Seek to Dubiously Deem Biden an Insurrectionist

While it’s evident to many why Trump could be deemed an insurrectionist, the lawmakers’ claims on Biden are murkier.

President Joe Biden listens to a question shouted from the press as he arrives at the White House on December 19, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

Three Republican legislators have announced plans to deny President Joe Biden the right to appear on their respective state’s ballot.

The plans are a direct response to a Colorado Supreme Court ruling last week deeming former President Donald Trump to be ineligible to run for office on the state’s ballot next year due to his engagement in and/or aiding of an insurrection against the U.S. Constitution on January 6, 2021.

In a statement to the far right website Breitbart, Rep. Aaron Bernstine (R-Pennsylvania), Rep. Charlice Byrd (R-Georgia) and Rep. Cory McGarr (R-Arizona) explicitly cited the court ruling from last week as their motivation. The GOP representatives described the court’s decision as “lawfare,” despite strong evidence demonstrating Trump did indeed engage in insurrectionist behavior.

“The absurdity of radical Democrat judges removing Donald Trump from the ballot in Colorado will be a stain on the American political system for decades,” the three lawmakers claimed. “By their very own interpretation of the law, Joe Biden is 100% not eligible to run for political office.”

The rationales given by GOP reps are political and have nothing to do with insurrection. Instead, they are motivated by disagreements over policies on immigration and border security, as well as “his alleged corrupt family business dealings with China,” which Republicans have yet to actually demonstrate beyond innuendo and unsubstantiated assertions.

The absurdity of these lawmakers’ claims is reflected in their use of red-baiting terminology, stating in their justification for going after Biden that “communists” are currently running the country.

This effort to disqualify Biden from being able to run isn’t the only action being taken by Republicans in the wake of the Colorado ruling — Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R), for instance, has similarly said he may try to block Biden from his state’s ballot, citing the same dubious claim that Biden’s border policies make him an insurrectionist.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that no person can run for political office in the U.S. again if they had previously taken an oath “to support the Constitution of the United states” and then subsequently “engaged in insurrection” or aided those who had. While evidence that Biden has violated this part of the Constitution is non-existent, for many, including the Colorado Supreme Court, it is clear that Trump, indeed, has engaged in insurrectionist behavior.

Trump, for example, used incendiary rhetoric to rile up a mob of his loyalists on January 6, 2021, and ordered them to descend on the Capitol to protest in favor of overturning his loss to Biden in the 2020 presidential election, where they subsequently breached the building and threatened the lives of lawmakers who chose not to illegally keep Trump in office. The former president also used that attack to pressure lawmakers to help him overturn the results of the Electoral College.

Legal experts have said that Trump’s use of a fake electors plot to attempt to “win” the Electoral College, too, could also be seen as an attempt at insurrection.

A snap poll from YouGov the day after the Colorado Supreme Court ruling found that 54 percent of Americans approved of the court’s action, with only 35 percent opposed to it. Although quick turnaround polls such as this one aren’t the most scientifically accurate, the poll suggests that a significant portion of the U.S. electorate likely approves of pursuing this option in other states to block Trump from being president again.

Other states may announce whether Trump will be disqualified in those jurisdictions from running for president again. In Michigan, for example, a similar case is running through the court system wherein voters there, like in Colorado, are demanding Trump be deemed an insurrectionist. In Maine, state Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) is expected to announce this week whether Trump is disqualified from running there.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to take up the ruling issued by the Colorado Supreme Court, which issued a temporary stay on its own ruling until January 4.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy