Skip to content Skip to footer

GOP Lawmakers Block Virginia Amendments on Marriage Equality, Voting Rights

Amendments to the state’s constitution must be approved in two legislative sessions before being included on the ballot.

The Virginia state capitol building is pictured in Richmond, Virginia.

Republicans in the Virginia House of Delegates have rejected constitutional amendments to restore the voting rights of people who have been convicted of felonies and to remove anti-LGBTQ language from the state constitution — meaning that Virginians will not be able to vote on the measures during the state’s midterm elections this fall.

In Virginia, any changes to the constitution must be approved by two concurrent sessions of the state legislature. After that, a statewide referendum is held, and if a majority of voters approve of the measure, it will be enshrined in the state constitution.

Although the Virginia legislature approved both proposals in its previous session, the rejection of the proposals this week means that they will be thrown out, and voters will not have the opportunity to weigh in on the changes during the upcoming midterm elections.

On Tuesday, the subcommittee voted 5-4 to reject a proposal that would have automatically restored the voting rights of individuals who have been convicted of a felony and completed the terms of their sentence. The subcommittee also voted 6-4 against a marriage equality amendment, which would have altered the constitution to remove any wording that referenced the state’s defunct ban on same-sex marriage.

Virginia barred same-sex marriage in an amendment that passed in 2006. In 2015, the federal Supreme Court ruled that states could not restrict marriage on the basis of sex or gender.

Del. Dawn Adams (D), the first openly lesbian woman to serve in the House of Delegates, gave an impassioned speech ahead of the party-line vote in which Republicans rejected the marriage equality amendment.

“My entire life all I ever wanted to be was married. And my entire life I knew that wasn’t a possibility,” Adams said.

“You really can’t understand what it’s like to grow up in an environment when you knew you didn’t mean anything to anyone,” she added.

Republican opponents of the amendment claimed that they voted against the measure because its framework would make it possible for the state to legalize polygamy. But the language of the proposed amendment was very specific, clarifying that the state would recognize marriages “equally under the law regardless of the sex or gender of the parties to the marriage.”

More than a dozen advocacy groups, including a conservative one, spoke in favor of passing the amendment. Not a single group advocated against its passage.

Del. Marcus Simon (D) called Republicans’ decision to reject the voting rights amendment “a truly cowardly move.” Former Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) also spoke out against the decision.

“Virginians who have paid their debt to society deserve to have their voices heard at the ballot box,” McAuliffe wrote on social media. “We wont [sic] stop fighting until we fully reverse this Jim Crow era law and make restoration of voting rights automatic.”

Currently, the only way a person who has been convicted of a felony in Virginia can vote is if the governor signs an order restoring their individual voting rights. During his time in office, former Gov. Ralph Northam (D) signed more than 126,000 orders restoring the voting rights of previously incarcerated Virginians.

“When people make mistakes, and pay their debts, they deserve the opportunity to return and be productive members of society,” Northam said in a statement near the end of his tenure. “We can all be proud that Virginia has been able to provide thousands of deserving people the opportunity for a fresh start.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 430 new monthly donors in the next 7 days.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy