Skip to content Skip to footer

GOP Has Already Filed a Deluge of Lawsuits to Challenge and Invalidate Ballots

Republicans are trying to get thousands of ballots thrown out even before Election Day has arrived.

Election workers presort absentee ballots that were cast in the city of Detroit during the 2022 general election at Huntington Place in Detroit, Michigan, on November 6, 2022.

Even before Election Day has arrived, Republicans and right-wing groups have already filed dozens of lawsuits in the hopes of invalidating thousands of votes in states that could be key in determining control of Congress for the next two years.

The GOP has filed an avalanche of lawsuits in swing states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, where contested races could help determine control of the House or the Senate. These lawsuits target voter eligibility and technicalities in mail-in ballots, with the potential to change outcomes or at least delay results if they are taken up in court.

According to Democracy Docket, at least 120 election-related lawsuits had been filed as of Thursday, more than half of which are seeking to restrict ballot access. Many of the cases have been brought by fringe right-wing groups that helped Donald Trump in his attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, although about one in five were brought by official GOP committees or by the Republican National Committee (RNC) itself.

This is nearly double the number of lawsuits that had been filed ahead of Election Day in 2020, signaling that suing to invalidate votes or overturn election results may now be a bedrock election strategy for Republicans after Trump, without evidence, opened a pathway within the right wing to attempt to overthrow or question the legitimacy of elections — a harbinger of fascism.

One particularly high-profile case is being fought in Pennsylvania, where the RNC has successfully sued to get election officials to discount ballots in which a voter didn’t put the date on the outside of the envelope, potentially invalidating thousands of ballots.

The state Supreme Court ruled in the GOP’s favor last week, and the amount of ballots that now may not be counted could determine the result of prominent races like the U.S. Senate race between John Fetterman and Mehmet Oz, which polls show is at a dead heat.

Targeting mail-in ballots is at least in part a strategy to suppress Democratic votes. In 2020, Trump railed against mail-in ballots, falsely claiming that they disproportionately favor Democrats. In some cases, the lawsuits also directly seek to suppress the vote in Black areas that typically lean Democratic.

In Michigan, for instance, the Republican candidate for secretary of state, Kristina Karamo, filed a lawsuit over absentee ballots in Detroit, which is 77 percent Black, trying to get absentee ballots that weren’t retrieved from the city clerk’s office thrown out, even though there are no state requirements that absentee ballots be obtained in such a way. The lawsuit was dismissed by a county judge on Monday.

Republicans have had luck in Wisconsin, however. In Wisconsin, absentee voters must have a witness — who must sign a ballot envelope and provide an address — attest that they legally completed a ballot. Recently, a county’s Republican Party won a suit to block election officials from being able to correct witness’s address information if it is missing from mail-in ballots. In response, voting rights groups asked for new guidelines on what elements of an address would invalidate a ballot, but a judge ruled that it was too close to the election for such a change.

Experts have raised the alarm about the conservative lawsuits, saying that they are an attempt to attack mail-in voting and suppress votes, working in concert with other attacks on the election process. In Texas earlier this year, for instance, new Republican-made voting restrictions caused over 18,000 mail-in votes across many of the state’s largest counties to be thrown out.

Efforts to throw out mail-in votes could disproportionately affect voters with disabilities, as absentee voting is essential for such populations.

Mail-in voting is likely just the first frontier for Republicans’ legal challenges. Ever since each of Trump’s lawsuits over the 2020 election failed, Republicans have been beefing up their election legal strategies and have spent the last two years building up a nationwide network of operatives at all levels of elections to contest election results.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.