Part of the Series
Voting Wrongs
Outgoing North Carolina Rep. Wiley Nickel (D) penned an op-ed this week blaming Republican gerrymandering in the state for the lopsided outcome of North Carolina’s congressional races and for tipping the scales of Congress as a whole in favor of the GOP.
In an op-ed for The Raleigh News & Observer, Nickel noted that the result of the presidential election in North Carolina— and the results of other races in the state— showed close to a 50-50 split, representative of the “purple” status North Carolina is known for. However, because of Republican gerrymandering last year, the congressional delegation leaned Republican, with a 10-4 split.
That six-seat difference is wider than the five-seat advantage that Republicans have over Democrats in the House of Representatives. Had the delegation had an even 7-7 split (as it has under fairer maps), control of the House of Representatives would have been granted to Democrats, not Republicans, as that chamber of Congress is set to have 220 seats for the GOP and 215 seats for Democrats.
“The congressional map we used to have, with a 7-7 Republican-Democratic split, reflected the true political makeup of our state,” Nickel wrote. “It was fair. It gave voters on both sides confidence that their voices mattered.”
“It doesn’t take a mathematician to see…that gerrymandering in North Carolina tipped the scales in their favor and cost Democrats control of the U.S. House of Representatives,” Nickel said, adding that “New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries would be our next Speaker of the House with a one-seat Democratic majority at 218-217” had North Carolina’s congressional delegation been truly representative of voters’ preferences.
“This wasn’t an accident. This was by design. … The MAGA Republicans in Raleigh who drew these maps didn’t care about reflecting the will of the people,” Nickel opined. “They cared about power.”
North Carolina Republicans were able to redraw the maps in their favor after winning control of the state legislature in 2020. But the maps they drew were determined to be partisan and racially discriminatory gerrymanders by the state Supreme Court, and they were ordered to redraw them. Republicans sued over that decision to the federal Supreme Court.
Eventually, that court, too, ruled against them, but the delay allowed for statewide elections to shift the balance of the state Supreme Court to conservative control. Republicans relitigated their maps to that changed court, which ruled in their favor, allowing the maps to be drawn to their advantage.
Despite the outcome in his home state, Nickel said he’s not giving up, and will continue to fight against “extreme, partisan gerrymandering” in the future.
“The people of North Carolina and across the country deserve better. They deserve fair maps, a fair system, and a democracy they can trust,” Nickel said. “It’s time to end gerrymandering once and for all.”
Partisan gerrymandering wasn’t just a factor in North Carolina’s election. In Wisconsin, for example, the congressional delegation that will be sent to Washington in January has a 6-2 split favoring Republicans over Democrats, despite that state seeing a near-even split in terms of the presidential race.
Like North Carolina, Wisconsin’s state Supreme Court also issued a ruling against Republicans’ partisan-drawn maps, made possible by a shift in the ideological balance of the state Supreme Court in 2023. However, that ruling only affected the state legislature, and not congressional districts.
The changing of one set of maps and the leaving in place of another exemplifies how partisan Republicans’ maps truly were — while Wisconsin’s congressional delegation is lopsided, there was a more balanced outcome for the state legislature in the 2024 elections, with Republicans in the legislature going from having a 29-seat majority to just a nine-seat advantage in the 99-seat Assembly.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy