Lakota elders, activists and non-indigenous supporters march through New York's Times Square to United Nations, April 9, 2013. (Photo: Victoria Law)
On Tuesday, April 9, Lakota elders, activists and nonindigenous supporters marched through the streets of Manhattan to the United Nations, where they attempted to present a petition to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. Entitled the Official Lakota Oyate Complaint of Genocide Based on the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the petition listed the numerous injustices faced by the Lakota people. (Oyate is a Sioux word for “people” or “nation.”)
At the UN, security officers informed them that they would not be able to enter the building and present the complaint to the Secretary General. Instead, the security officers offered to take it to Ban’s office, but refused to give the Lakota documentation verifying that their complaint had been received.
Outside the UN, Charmaine White Face, a Lakota grandmother and great-grandmother, addressed the 60 people who had marched with her. “We come here as a nation. If they won’t let us take our message to them, how disrespectful is that to a nation?”
The action is part of the 13-city Truth Tour by Lakota elders and activists to draw attention to the situation of the Lakota, mobilize solidarity networks to benefit Lakota elders, and renew the Lakotas’ traditional matriarchal leadership on South Dakota’s Pine Ridge Reservation and across the Lakota nation. Between April 1 and 16, they traveled to Minneapolis, Chicago and other points east and west.
With Colonization Came the End to the Matriarchal Leadership
Canupa Gluha Mani, founder of the Strong Heart Warriors Society, speakers before marching to the United Nations, April 9, 2013. (Photo: Victoria Law)“The matriarchal system changed when the colonizers arrived in 1492,” Canupa Gluha Mani, a Lakota activist and founder of the Strong Heart Warriors Society, told Truthout.
History backs up his assertion: As the United States encroached upon indigenous territory, treaties were negotiated between the United States government and the indigenous nations. After going through hundreds of documents, historians M. Annette Jaimes and Theresa Halsey asserted, “In not one of the more than 370 ratified and perhaps 300 unratified treaties negotiated by the United States with indigenous nations was the federal government willing to allow participation by native women. In none of the several thousand non-treaty agreements … were federal representatives prepared to discuss anything at all with women. In no instance was the United States open to recognizing a female as representing her people’s interests when it came to administering the reservations onto which American Indians were ultimately forced; always, men were required to do what was necessary to secure delivery of rations, argue for water rights, and all the rest.” (from “American Indian Women: At the Center of Indigenous Resistance in Contemporary North America,” in The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization and Resistance, ed. M. Annette Jaimes. Boston, Massachusetts: South End Press, 1992, 322.)
White Face, a Lakota elder and great-grandmother of nine, noted that under the matriarchal system, “The ones who made the decisions for the community were the grandmothers. There were societies of grandmothers. Colonizing has forced people to forget these ways. There are still some of us who were taught the old way. I learned from my grandmother. Other people didn’t have that opportunity.”
And there is the matter of language. “In one lifetime, the number of Lakota speakers has dropped 75 percent,” states the Complaint. “There have been no new Lakota speakers in three generations. There are 6,000 to 8,000 Lakota language speakers left.”
An infant mortality rate more than 300 percent the national average
Alcoholism affecting eight in ten families
A tuberculosis rate on Lakota reservations approximately 800 percent higher than the national average
A cervical cancer rate 500 percent higher than the national average
Corruption in the current leadership
Retaliation against elders and activists who attempt to speak out against the corruption
Charmaine White Face addresses supporters before marching to the United Nations, April 9, 2013. (Photo: Victoria Law)White Face notes that she and other Lakota grandmothers seek the enforcement of the 1868 Fort Laramie treaty. In the treaty, the United States recognized the Black Hills of Dakota as part of the great Sioux Reservation and set the land aside for exclusive use by the Sioux people. However, six years later, Gen. George Custer led an expedition into the Black Hills, where they found gold. Miners began moving into Sioux territory, demanding protection from the US army. In 1876, Custer led an army detachment to the Little Bighorn River, where they were soundly defeated by the Sioux. The following year, the US government confiscated the land from the Sioux.
In 1882, the United States began imposing an assimilation policy on the Lakota and other Native nations, outlawing key spiritual practices and forcibly removing children from their homes to send them to boarding schools, where thousands died or ran away. In 1890, at what would become known as the massacre at Wounded Knee, government forces killed over 300 Lakota men, women and children.
“The [1868] treaty spells out absolute and undisturbed land use and occupation [for the Lakota],” White Face told Truthout. “If we could get that, we can fix everything else our way.”
She noted that the Lakota have been sending delegates to the UN since 1984 requesting its assistance in helping enforce the terms of the Fort Laramie treaty. “We’ve never been able to get them to help.”
Gluha Mani recounted a meeting two months before the tour began. “They almost beat Charmaine White Face up. Why? Because she was telling the truth! Someone had to come get me to protect her.”
When asked about being attacked at a meeting, White Face responded, “Which one?” Then, more soberly, she stated, “When I speak out against corruption, that’s when I get attacked.”
One week before the Truth Tour left South Dakota, another Lakota woman, Lorraine White Face, was assaulted while buying gas. “She was assaulted because she challenged the tribal council. She told the head of the tribal council to do his job professionally or not at all,” recalled Gluha Mani, whom she called from a nearby store.
Barbara Charging Crow reads the Official Lakota Oyate Complaint of Genocide Based on the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide outside the United Nations, April 9, 2013. (Photo: Victoria Law)Barbara Charging Crow does not live on Pine Ridge. Her husband’s mother is one of the Lakota elders in Wanblee, South Dakota, east of Pine Ridge. However, corruption is just as much a problem there as on Pine Ridge and other reservations.
Charging Crow told Truthout that in the summer of 2010, the government began laying water pipes through Wanblee, diverting the area’s groundwater and replacing it with water from the Missouri River. “My mother-in-law used to be able to turn on her faucet and get water from all over. It smelled a certain way; it tasted a certain way. And then, in summer 2010, she turns on her tap and gets water that smells different and tastes different and is polluted river water. And the whole time, church groups are there, patting kids on the head, cleaning up the garbage, singing songs about Jesus Christ, and the whole time the government’s trenching our water.
“The government sent $6 million, supposedly for ‘economic support,'” Charging Crow continued. “The cover page said it was for economic support. But under the first page, it said that this was to pay for our water. Right away, 60 percent of that money is unaccounted for. The behavior of embezzlement has been going on for so long that people think they can get away with more and more. It’s getting worse. Then, just before the grandmas leave, people start getting checks for $1,000 for the change in their water. Is $1,000 going to cover people’s cancer treatment?”
When Charging Crow heard about the Truth Tour and learned that some of the grandmothers were unable to travel, she decided to join. “I’m also a grandma,” she said. “I’m a young grandma, not an old one. I’m not an 80-year-old grandma. But I wanted to raise awareness of the abuses and the need for accountability. These grandmas have been living here this whole time, but now they’re looking at real-life extinction.”
Treaty Territories Surrounded by Open Uranium Mines
Charmaine White Face is the spokesperson for the treaty council created in 1894 to work toward the enforcement of the Fort Laramie treaty. She is also a biologist concerned about the environment of the treaty territory. In the fall of 2003, White Face learned about the uranium mines on the Lakota lands abandoned in the 1970s. Many of the mines have no barriers or signs warning the public not to enter. Many are still emitting radiation. In response, she started Defenders of the Black Hills, an all-volunteer group that pushes for the clean-up of abandoned uranium mines on sacred Lakota Lands. White Face has taken journalists into the mines to see the dangers firsthand. “You’ll see front-page exposés of the uranium mines in [news outlets] in Germany, but not here,” she added.
Charmaine White Face and other defenders of the Black Hills remain undeterred. She notes that even the most assimilated (or “colonized,” as she calls them) people on Pine Ridge support her efforts to clean up the uranium mines. In 2007, White Face won the Nuclear-Free Feature Award for her work in exposing the dangers of uranium mining.
The Truth Tour
Supporter on Lakota elders’ march to the United Nations, April 9, 2013. (Photo: Victoria Law)The Lakota elders did not gain entrance to the UN that Tuesday afternoon. (As of the night of April 10 – the day following their appearance at the UN’s Manhattan headquarters – they were still waiting for word from the secretary general’s office.)
That night, they screened their documentary Red Cryand spoke about the issues at New York’s Church of St. Paul and St. Andrew. “Our reception in New York has been exceptional and overwhelming,” Charmaine? White Face told Truthout the following day.
Charging Crow agrees. “All the people everywhere have been beautiful. Meeting other activists and organizers who have done so many amazing things is an incredibly humbling experience.” But she reminds us, “We are trying to get people to see the ugly realities of extinction and genocide. These grandmas have been living here [in Pine Ridge, Wanblee and other territories] this whole time, but now they’re looking at real-life extinction. Going extinct is genocide.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
