Terror suspect and former Guantanamo detainee Ahmed Ghailani was convicted on November 17 for conspiring to blow up buildings during the 1998 bombings of the American embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. Following five years of detention at Guantanamo Bay after his capture in 2004, Ghailani is the first former Guantanamo detainee to be tried in federal court. He was acquitted of all but one of the initial 285 charges against him and faces a possible life sentence.
But the trial, which took place in a New York federal district court, also served to relaunch a debate on the effectiveness of military commissions.
Rep. Peter King (R-Long Island), the incoming chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, called the verdict a “total miscarriage of justice,” while Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) said that terror suspects should either be tried in a military commission or never given a day in court. The president should ensure that “terrorists will be tried from now on in the military commission system that was established for this very purpose at the secure Guantanamo Bay, or detained indefinitely, if they cannot be tried without jeopardizing national security,” McConnell said.
Meanwhile, advocates of federal trials have pointed to the number of terror suspects to be tried in civilian court since 9/11, totaling more than 400 today, while military commissions have made five convictions overall in the same time span. Three were plea deals, including that of former child soldier Omar Khadr.
Human Rights First Law and Security Program senior associate Daphne Eviatar said, “The military commissions remain rife with constitutional defects. Federal courts have far more legal tools to prosecute terror suspects.”
In particular, Eviatar said, civilian trials move at a much swifter pace than military commissions because federal procedures are much more clear. “In a military commission, no one seems to know what the law is,” Eviatar said. “A lot of time gets wasted trying to figure out what to do. If you don’t know what the law is, it’s very hard to have a fair trial.”
A pivotal moment during the trial came when Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that testimony from key witness Hussein Abebe was inadmissible, as he was present during an interrogation when Ghailani claims he was tortured. Opponents of federal trials have insisted that the evidence would have been admitted in a military commission, leading to a tougher sentence for Ghailani, but Kaplan pointed to US military code regulations which ensure that “No statement obtained by the use of torture or by cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment … shall be admissible.”
“It is very far from clear that Abebe’s testimony would be admissible if Ghailani were being tried by military commission, even without regard to the question whether the Fifth Amendment would invalidate any more forgiving provisions of the rules of evidence otherwise applicable in such a proceeding,” Kaplan wrote.
Critics and supporters were also split on potential safety measures necessary for a terror trial. But predictions for security problems during the trial, as alluded to by McConnell in his statement to the Senate and in previous months by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy, proved to be empty. The city did not close down any streets for Ghailani’s trial or request any financial help from the government for extra security, and there were no disruptions or threats throughout the 57-day trial.
Eviatar said that the safety and speed of federal courts should give the government clarity in the midst of a political battle. “To say these guys should be in a military commission makes it sound tougher, but the federal court has a much stronger track record,” Eviatar said. “If we keep not giving justice to people or not giving them fair trials, we’re undermining our brand.”
The conviction is also important in light of the Obama administration’s controversial handling of terror suspect Khalid Sheik Mohammed’s case, Eviatar said. Mohammed is currently in detention indefinitely at Guantanamo and has not been scheduled for a trial either by military commission or federal court. “The failure to bring to justice some of the most heinous criminals in US history is a disservice to this country,” Eviatar said.
“The Obama administration should act now to prosecute other terror suspects who remain at Guantanamo in federal court – a system that has proven much more successful and adept than commissions.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 500 new monthly donors in the next 10 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy