The company owned by billionaire conservative activist brothers Charles and David Koch has rejected Senate Democrats’ request for information about climate change research funding—an inquiry the legislators sent to fossil fuel industry players in the wake of a cash-for-analysis scandal.
A response to the letter from a Koch Industries Inc. lawyer struck a defiant tone, describing the request as an infringement on free speech.
“To the extent that your letter touches on matters that implicate the First Amendment, I am sure you recognize Koch’s right to participate in the debate of important public policy issues and its right of free association,” Mark Holden, Koch senior vice president and general counsel remarked.
The riposte was reported late Tuesday night by the Associated Press. A spokesperson for Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), one of the Democratic lawmakers who asked for the information alongside Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), told the AP that companies “supporting legitimate, scientific inquiry should have no concerns about responding.”
The free speech defense offered by the Kochs sidesteps the fact that some government-funded activities are at the heart of the matter.
The senators’ probe was sparked last month, after Greenpeace and the Climate Investigations Center revealed that an industry-funded Smithsonian Institution scientist, Willie Soon, was describing his published works, in private conversations with benefactors, as “deliverables.”
The Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics scientist used the term to refer to both papers and Congressional testimony, the environmentalist activists found, after obtaining some of Soon’s emails through a Freedom of Information Act request.
The Smithsonian Institution is set to receive $819.5 million in federal appropriations this fiscal year. Only about one in ten scientists believe that climate change is not “mostly due to human activity.”
The First Amendment defense offered by the Kochs also obscures legal issues—namely that industry support of climate change deniers could be illegal, under federal civil statutes.
As Dan Zegart detailed in an April 2014 article in The Nation, some legal analysts “believe that fossil fuel producers could be vulnerable to fraud or civil conspiracy charges if it can be legally proved that companies…spent millions funding climate-change-denying organizations…while internally acknowledging that the science supporting anthropogenic (i.e., human-caused) climate change was a settled issue.”
“That could put Big Carbon in roughly the same position as Big Tobacco was in the early 1990s, when cigarette makers continued to cultivate public doubt about their product’s harmfulness long after they had accepted that it was addictive and deadly,” Zegart wrote.
Revelations that would emerge in any discovery process might turn the tide of public opinion against the fossil fuel industry, he also noted.
Soon received $230,000 from the Charles G. Koch Foundation and $324,000 in anonymous gifts funneled through a trust “used by the Kochs and other conservative donors,” The Guardian noted.
He also received $335,000 from ExxonMobil until 2010, and $274,000 from the American Petroleum Institute.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.