Republican front-runner Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders made their positions on fracking clear last weekend. Trump is all for it. Clinton too, but only if a list of conditions met. Sanders is against it.
Trump brought up fracking on Friday at a New Orleans campaign rally. “New York has been let down, they didn’t allow them to frack,” Trump said. “If they fracked in New York, New York would lower its taxes, would have no debt, would have made a fortune. Instead Pennsylvania took all their money.”
Praising Pennsylvania, Trump said, “They took those beautiful, beautiful natural resources. They took ’em out.” He failed to mention hundreds of reports of water contaminated by the Pennsylvania fracking industry.
His assessment was also out of step with Louisiana’s economic reality. While Louisiana’s fracking industry boomed for years before the recent downturn, the state is currently facing a budget shortfall that is close to a billion dollars.
Trump claimed he can win in New York. Upstate New Yorkers — deprived of exploiting the natural gas under their land due to the state’s fracking ban — love him. But New York’s fracking ban was passed as a result of popular support. His position is unlikely to gain him many votes.
And it probably failed to win him many votes in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana either, where there is an ongoing battle to stop fracking before it starts.
On Sunday, during the Democratic debate in Flint, Michigan, the first question on fracking in any of the debates to date was raised. A member of the audience asked Clinton, “Do you support fracking?”
Clinton listed four conditions that must be met before she can support fracking. “I don’t support it when any locality or any state is against it, number one. I don’t support it when the release of methane or contamination of water is present. I don’t support it, number three, unless we can require that anybody who fracks has to tell us exactly what chemicals they are using,” Clinton said.
Clinton’s declaration was a surprise to many. It contradicts her campaign’s stance on embracing the natural gas industry. The natural gas industry is reliant on an active fracking industry, which until the debate, she supported.
Bernie and Hillary #1DBBD13 from JFOX on Vimeo.
Anti-fracking activist filmmaker Josh Fox thought Clinton’s statement was insincere, according to his post on AlterNet.
Fox’s most recent movie, Gasland Part ll, exposed Clinton’s role in promoting fracking throughout the world via the State Department’s Global Shale Gas Initiative, when she was Secretary of State.
For Fox to take Clinton seriously, she would need to renounce her plan for “Ensuring Safe and Responsible Natural Gas Production,” that is currently displayed on her campaign website.
Clinton’s call for the fracking industry to disclose all of the chemicals it uses is contrary to the new federal rules for fracking on federal land issued last year by the Department of the Interior. The rules only require companies to make disclosures outlined by Frac Focus, an industry-created national hydraulic fracturing chemical registry run by the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission and the Ground Water Protection Council. The registry allows companies to omit listing chemicals they deem trade secrets, falling short of full disclosure.
Hillary Clinton’s video message plays during a Democratic fundraiser in New Orleans on July 1, 2015. 2015 (Photo: Julie Dermansky)
Bernie Sanders speaks at a Democratic fundraising event in New Orleans on July 1, 2015. (Photo: Julie Dermansky)
Bernie Sanders’ answer to the fracking question was more to the point.
“No, I do not support fracking,” Sanders said.
When asked by moderator Anderson Cooper if he thinks the Democratic governors who say fracking can be done safely and has helped their economy are wrong, Sanders replied, “yes.”
Further differentiating himself from Clinton, Sanders made it clear Clinton has the support of the governors and senators in the Democratic Party who, like her, are the establishment players taking money from the oil and gas industry. He contends taking money from corporate sponsors makes you beholden to their interests.
Yet Clinton maintains she is not influenced by money from her contributors. When asked by Cooper about a fundraiser she attended in Philadelphia at the headquarters of Franklin Square Capital Partners, a major investor in the fracking industry, she said, “I don’t know that.”
“Maybe while she was courting fracking financiers in Philadelphia she missed the massive leak at Porter Ranch, where for over 100 days a natural gas storage facility sent a geyser of potent greenhouse gas into the air,” Fox wrote. “Let’s hope that she can reject the path being paved for her by fossil fuel industry money.”
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $125,000 in one-time donations and to add 1400 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy