As reported in The New York Times the Heartland Institute, which is funded by fossil-fuel corporations, has spoken out against Pope Francis’ statements about climate change. Saying that the Pope has been misled by “the United Nations’ unscientific agenda on the climate,” the Heartland Institute plans to send a team to Rome “to inform Pope Francis of the truth about climate science.”
How seriously people should take the Heartland Institute is suggested by this excerpt from David Ray Griffin’s recent book, Unprecedented: Can Civilization Survive the CO2 Crisis?
Excerpt
Just as Frederick Seitz had helped the tobacco industry in its initiative to defeat anti-smoking regulations, pointed out Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway in The Merchants of Doubt, another physicist, Fred Singer, helped the industry’s effort to defeat regulations involving environmental tobacco smoke. With the assistance of APCO Associates, a public relations firm hired by Philip Morris, Singer had created the Science and Environment Policy Project to promote what he called “sound science” and to denounce what he called “junk science.”
“The rhetoric of ‘sound science’ is,” point out Oreskes and Conway, “Orwellian. Real science – done by scientists and published in scientific journals – is dismissed as ‘junk,’ while misrepresentations and inventions are offered in its place.”
Having used the “junk science” claim in debates about acid rain and the ozone layer, Singer used it in ExxonMobil’s disinformation campaign on climate change. Although Singer repeatedly denied that he received oil company money, ExxonMobil gave his Science and Environmental Policy Project $20,000 between 1998 and 2000. While under oath in 1993, moreover, Singer admitted that he had often worked as a paid consultant for the Global Climate Coalition and ExxonMobil (as well as Texaco, Arco, Shell, Sun, and Unocal). Singer argued as late as 1998 that “global warming is not happening.” But by 2007, he coauthored a book saying that, although it is happening, it is due to natural forces and hence unstoppable.
Having teamed up with the Heartland Institute, which “promote[s] free-market solutions to social and economic problems,” Singer in 2010 served as one of the three lead authors of the Heartland Institute’s 400-page report entitled “Climate Change Reconsidered.” Arguing that global warming is “unequivocally good news,” it says: “Rising CO2 levels increase plant growth and make plants more resistant to drought and pests. It is a boon to the world’s forests and prairies, as well as to farmers and ranchers.”
Having quoted part of this statement, a Rolling Stone article about the planet’s 17 worst “climate killers” included Singer, labeled “The Hack Scientist.”
The Heartland Institute website featured a banner that displayed Heartland’s president, Joseph L. Bast, along with other people, including Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison. The implication, evidently, was that these men’s writings, such as The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the United States, were not qualitatively superior to Bast’s best-known work, Please Don’t Poop on My Salad.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.