Half a year after Newark Public Schools launched an “agenda to ensure all students are in excellent schools,” the plan has come under a federal civil rights investigation to determine whether it “discriminates against black students.”
The investigation centers on a cluster of school closings in Newark’s predominantly black South Ward. Absent a consistent reason why the district targeted these schools – such as poor academics or declining enrollment – activists alleged discrimination. The “One Newark” reform plan, they wrote, would “continue a pattern of shuttering public schools in communities of color.”
This investigation could illuminate the structural forces behind Newark school reforms. Though there’s been ample media coverage of the city’s noisy school politics – from Mark Zuckerberg’s $100 million gift to this year’s contentious mayoral election – so far, these structural forces remain opaque.
But an in-depth look into the district’s ultimately unsuccessful attempt to close one South Ward school reveals how real estate concerns and facilities funding increasingly drive neighborhood school closings and the expansion of privately managed charter schools. By allocating millions of dollars in little-known bonds exclusively to charters while imposing austerity on public facilities, the state has quietly stacked the deck for charters, leaving neighborhood schools to molder in decline.
Times were tough for the Choice family in 2011. Just months after a home invasion forced them to relocate to a new neighborhood, 10-year-old DeVahna was hit by a car and hospitalized for weeks.
But DeVahna and her younger brother Darius, now12 and 9, found a second home in the K-8 Hawthorne Avenue School.
“The school went out of its way to accommodate DeVahna,” their mother Jacqueline Choice says. Teachers visited the home to keep DeVahna abreast of material she’d missed. When she returned to school temporarily in a wheelchair, staff and students diligently volunteered to carry her books and bring her lunch.
At Hawthorne, DeVahna and Darius “were finally in a comfortable place,” says Choice. “The teachers were very sympathetic to our situation.”
A midday text message from DeVahna last December shattered that sense of comfort. “Mommy, they’re closing the school!” Choice remembers reading. “I had to call her to find out what was going on. She was in tears.”
At the next board meeting, Superintendent Cami Anderson announced publicly what DeVahna had learned from her math teacher: Hawthorne would be handed over to a charter school, TEAM Academy, in a so-called “charter launch.” The staff would be replaced. All told, the district’s plan would impact a third of Newark’s schools.
Built in 1895, Hawthorne has withstood everything from the Federal Housing Administration’s near-complete redlining of the city and the exodus of the white middle class, to the riots of 1967 and long decades of economicmalaise that followed.
In 2011, came the Booker-Zuckerberg philanthropic blitz and Gov. Chris Christie’s appointment of Superintendent Anderson, all aiming to transform the state-run district into an educational free market. That means replacing “failing” district schools with charter schools, which are privately managed, publicly funded and freed from certain regulations.
The full answer, it turns out, has little to do with educational performance. It has more to do with budget priorities in the age of Christie.
Hawthorne hoped to ride out these reforms unscathed. Since Principal H. Grady James arrived in 2011, the low-income school has seen “an amazing transformation,” says a Hawthorne teacher (who asked to remain anonymous). Though it falls short of state averages, Hawthorne posted test scores last year that put it in the 94th percentile statewide in terms of student growth, outstripping all its Newark peers.
“Hawthorne did everything required by the state to stay open,” says Choice, including what she describes wearily as “a whole year prepping for testing.” That concentration on test scores, though grueling and arguably not an ideal educational focus, bore fruit, in terms of external evaluation of the district. “But once that was done,” says Choice, the district “came in and said: ‘Well, we’re closing the school anyway.'”
The district justifies the move in part by pointing to the roughly 40 percent of South Ward families who sit on the waiting lists for charter schools they’ve chosen. But on the whole, Hawthorne’s parents chose Hawthorne. Families boycotted school applications, held weekly protests and fired off countless letters to state officials. Choice began speaking out at board meetings, eventually joining the civil rights complaint that spurred the federal investigation.
The staff was also shocked. “Why us?” asks the Hawthorne teacher. “Why, in light of our achievements?”
That question vexed the community. The full answer, it turns out, has little to do with educational performance. It has more to do with budget priorities in the age of Christie.
Though Newark Public Schools (NPS) claims to use seven criteria for school turnover decisions, “No one question pulled the lever” for Hawthorne, says Gabrielle Wyatt, NPS executive director of strategy.
But it’s clear that one factor played an outsized role: money. Given the state funding landscape, NPS saw moving a charter in as a way to secure pressing building repairs.
Hawthorne’s spacious brick schoolhouse is crumbling. Thick layers of paint slough off in the stairwells. A browning hole in the third floor ceiling oozes over a water fountain.
Charters’ access to bonds allows them to “improve these community assets” – that is, school houses – “and allows the district to continue to operate. And keeps the district viable.” This saves the state, which controls Newark schools, from paying to fix the very schools it let fall into disrepair.
As it turns out, a charter school might be more likely to patch those holes than the district. “Charters have access to flexible bond resources that district schools do not,” says Ruben Roberts, director of community affairs at NPS, when asked about charter launches. “This allows them to improve community assets in a way the district would not be able to.”
Bringing a charter into Hawthorne could allow the state to scrimp on renovation costs. Charters’ access to bonds, Roberts says, allows them to “improve these community assets” – that is, school houses – “and allows the district to continue to operate. And keeps the district viable.” This saves the state, which controls Newark schools, from paying to fix the very schools it let fall into disrepair.
As Wyatt explains,”The charter launch strategy was about redirecting growth to communities . . . that need strong schools – that need their buildings to be flipped.”
When a charter school moves into a new building, it’s not unusual to see millions of dollars poured into renovations ranging from structural repairs to slick paint jobs. In the case of a school like Hawthorne, plugging the leaky ceilings and safeguarding against mold would likely be top priorities.
The 2009 federal stimulus authorized states to allocate $22 billion in qualified school construction bonds (QSCBs), which allow cash-strapped schools to secure interest-free bond financing. Banks that finance school construction receive subsidies from the feds equivalent to some benchmark interest rate around 5 percent. Banks can pull in a tidy profit, as can the motley cast of counsels and intermediaries who ink the deals.
Of the $440 million in QSCBs New Jersey received, nearly three-quarters have been approved – and so far, every penny has gone to charters. TEAM Academy alone gobbled up $138 million. This exclusive allocation of QSCBs to charter schools is highly unusual. California and Texas, for comparison, each allocated less than one-fifth of their QSCBs to charter schools.
Just as New Jersey earmarked its federal school bonds for charters, Christie was busy slashing education budgets and hobbling the department charged with repairing needy urban schools.
To be sure, QSCBs aren’t free money. Moreover, New Jersey charters “receive no facilities aid whatsoever,” says Rick Pressler of the New Jersey Charter Schools Association. Accordingly, they have to be “very creative about how they’re going to finance their facilities.”
And creative they’ve been. Newark charters have become “infamous for being able to leverage their bonds to flip buildings,” says Wyatt, and some of the city’s most contested charter projects have been buoyed by QSCBs. When NPS sold 18th Avenue School, a district school it had just closed, to TEAM Academy, the charter used $40 million in QSCBs to finance it.
As New Jersey muckraker Bob Braun detailed, the deal’s interested parties traced an eyebrow-raising constellation of tightly-connected players across the Jersey political spectrum. The sale engendered a complex of nonprofit and for-profit entities to navigate the regulatory environment. There were corporate interests like Goldman Sachs, nonprofit spinoffs with names like Kingston Educational Holdings, and even a profit-making company created specially for the deal, Pinkhulahoop1, LLC – whose partners all serve in various capacities at TEAM Academy.
Take Tim Carden, who formerly sat on New Jersey’s Economic Development Authority, the body responsible for approving school bonds. Carden is also the chairman of the board of Friends of TEAM Academy, the charter’s fundraising arm. Or take Dan Adan, another partner at Pinkhulahoop1, who splits his time between Manhattan hedge fund Perry Capital and TEAM Academy’s board – where Carden’s wife Amy Rosen also happens to sit.
TEAM has justified the dizzying arrangement by explaining that, in the end, it “saved millions of dollars compared to a typical financing.” It’s a luxury the district schools aren’t afforded.
Putting Out a Fire With a Teaspoon
Just as New Jersey earmarked its federal school bonds for charters, Christie was busy slashing education budgets and hobbling the department charged with repairing needy urban schools, the School Development Authority (SDA).
Established in 2000 to remedy stark funding disparities, the SDA controls billions of dollars for construction in disadvantaged districts. When Christie entered office, he shrunk the department’s staff by 30 percent and restricted its outlays to a trickle.
“Basically there wasn’t any work being done,” says Moriah Kinberg of Healthy Schools Now, a coalition that advocates for school repairs. While over 700 projects broke ground in the decade before, not a single project was initiated and completed between 2010 and 2013.
“I don’t think they were targeting Hawthorne in particular,” says a Newark parent. “I think they were targeting the South Ward.”
District schools like Hawthorne, meanwhile, slid further into dereliction. In 2013, Kinberg’s coalition begged Christie to address pressing safety issues. “Every day,” their letter read, “students in New Jersey are exposed to hazardous conditions like mold, lead, PCBs, and poor indoor air quality.”
In the last few months the SDA projects have resumed, but “it’s a drop in the bucket for the amount of work that needs to be done,” says Kinberg. “These conditions were building up for 30 or 40 years.”
NPS shares Kinberg’s frustrations. “It’s like trying to put out a fire with a teaspoon of water,” says Wyatt. The district estimates its aging schools need over $1 billion in repairs. In 2011, NPS submitted more than 100 urgent requests for repairs, particularly masonry projects (several Newark schools currently sport scaffold-like “bridging” to protect children from crumbling edifices).
After a yearlong delay, the SDA approved 17 projects, including structural repairs at Hawthorne. But the project was delegated to NPS to begin. And Hawthorne is still waiting.
Flipping a Neighborhood
Beside all this, there’s a larger project in the works for Newark’s South Ward. “I don’t think they were targeting Hawthorne in particular,” says Choice. “I think they were targeting the South Ward.”
She’s not far from the mark. NPS officials, taken with downtown development efforts, say that the Hawthorne charter launch fit into a broader South Ward revitalization effort.
Both Choice and NPS cite the same project as a harbinger for South Ward development: the Teachers Village. Initiated in 2012, the $150 million property contains three charter schools, teacher residences and sundry private businesses. The Manhattan-based developer secured over $100 million in public monies for the project, including over $20 million in QSCBs.
By systematically underfunding the public sector while extending market incentives to private actors, the Christie administration has essentially placed its thumb on the scale for charters.
Though it was criticized for catering to charter schools only and excluding community input, the project’s success has the district eyeing the South Ward for a similar effort. Teachers Village is “bringing a renaissance to the Central Ward,” says Wyatt. The project turned several blighted city blocks into a pedestrian-friendly, multi-use development intended to remake the downtown area. “We want to bring that type of renaissance to the South Ward. We’re pushing quite feverishly to get to that point.”
But that effort means rejiggering the district’s “portfolio,” the collection of schools it manages like a set of financial assets. And it means finding cash. “The mistake would be to think that NPS is the solution,” Wyatt says, “because we don’t have the funds nor do we have access to the funds.”
But charters, she says, do. The question becomes: “How can we work collaboratively to flip a neighborhood?”
Revitalization, of course, looks different depending on whom you ask. Choice sees it as an effort “to push us out of here so that they can rebuild this area.” The district disputes this characterization: Development in the South Ward, NPS argues, will treat residents to the kind of resources downtown Newark currently enjoys.
It goes without saying that this kind of redevelopment requires roping in charter schools. But it’s also understood that neighborhood schools like Hawthorne get shouldered aside.
The push for charter schools rests on the notion that parent choice ought to dictate which schools open and close. Families, says NPS, are “voting with their feet” in choosing charter schools (the feet marching outside of Hawthorne don’t count).
But the fact that New Jersey stoppered facilities funding while directing $300 million in bonds to charters gives the lie to the notion that charters and district schools compete on a level playing field. As dilapidated neighborhood schools importune the SDA for urgent repairs, charters watch major construction projects break ground through no-interest loans not available to schools like Hawthorne.
It’s a familiar pattern. By systematically underfunding the public sector while extending market incentives to private actors, the Christie administration has essentially placed its thumb on the scale for charters. The result: Some charters enjoy gleaming new facilities (bankrolled by the same financial milieu that spends its down time plugging them), while the public sector continues its decline.
For its part, the district rejects the notion that it’s charging toward its own obsolescence; at the very least, its hands are tied. The state determines charter growth at the same time it disburses facilities funds, leaving Newark little wiggle room.
Still, NPS isn’t entirely blameless. Its “portfolio” model of school governance treats schools like financial assets rather than like the individual communities they are. While it speaks of expanding “school options” and following “demand,” it evinces little interest in non-market options or in democratic demands.
“If They Wanna Step On You, They’re Going to”
In the last week of school, Hawthorne parents and teachers received some welcome news: Superintendent Anderson announced that “due to family demand,” Hawthorne would remain unchanged next year.
It was a victory for the parents like Choice, who battled the notoriously unyielding superintendent for months. State officials reportedly pressured Anderson to “extend an olive branch to Hawthorne,” the teacher says.
But the announcement mentioned the 2014-2015 school year only. “It doesn’t mean we don’t go through the same battle again next year,” says the Hawthorne teacher.
Choice is also skeptical. “I wish I could say there was a sigh of relief,” she says, “but there wasn’t one.”
One fear is that Hawthorne will be “divested” – the district’s characteristically market-inflected term for phasing out a building. District officials I spoke with didn’t rule out this option.
Tellingly, TEAM eventually declined to have any presence at Hawthorne, despite the fact that, as Wyatt says, the district “pushed very hard for TEAM” to serve Hawthorne and other K-8 schools. The charter even rejected a compromise, which would have given it a K-1 school alongside a district K-4 at Hawthorne. But it won’t be far off. Starting next year, TEAM will launch in nearby Bragaw Elementary, a five-minute walk from Hawthorne.
The contrast between NPS’s accommodating relationship with TEAM and its indifference toward a century-old neighborhood school exemplifies the struggle in Newark: A school system that ostensibly elevates parent choice, actually functions on market forces far removed from democratic processes.
To Jacqueline Choice, it sends a clear message to Darius and DeVahna. “No matter what you do, it’s not gonna do any good. Because if they wanna step on you, they’re going to,” Choice says.
The day before I spoke with Choice, Governor Christie was in Aspen sounding off on his new political foil, Mayor Ras Baraka. “I said to him listen, I’ll listen to whatever you have to say,” Christie told his audience. “But the state runs the school system. I am the decider, and you have nothing to do with it.”