Skip to content Skip to footer

First US Omicron Death Was Reinfection, Debunking GOP’s “Natural Immunity” Claim

Reinfection rates are 5.4 times higher under Omicron than they were under the Delta variant, one study shows.

Houston Fire Department paramedics prepare to transport a woman who reported COVID symptoms to a hospital on August 25, 2021, in Houston, Texas.

The first person to die from the Omicron variant of COVID-19 in the U.S. had already been infected with COVID in the past, further discrediting “natural immunity” claims made by conservative politicians who oppose mask and vaccine mandates.

The patient who died was a man between the ages of 50 and 60 who had previously been infected with COVID-19. Health officials described him as being “at higher risk of severe complications from COVID-19 due to his unvaccinated status and underlying health conditions.” The death occurred in Harris County, Texas.

“We urge all residents who qualify to get vaccinated and get their booster shot if they have not already,” Harris County Public Health Director Barbie Robinson said.

Although COVID reinfections are generally viewed as rare, they do happen. Identifying coronavirus reinfection rates across the U.S. has been challenging for researchers due to limited resources, meaning that current estimations are likely an undercount. However, individual states have identified hundreds of instances of reinfection.

A study that was published last week from the Imperial College of London demonstrated that the Omicron variant has a higher reinfection rate than previous strains of the virus — in fact, the risk of getting reinfected by Omicron is 5.4 times higher than the risk of getting reinfected by the Delta variant.

Researchers in the study also noted that there’s no evidence that Omicron is any less severe than previous variants, despite several media reports claiming otherwise.

These findings further discredit the “natural immunity” strategy that has been pushed by several Republican lawmakers. In order to sidestep vaccine mandates for workers, including those in the health care industry, some Republican politicians have suggested that prior COVID-19 diagnoses should be considered equivalent to being vaccinated when it comes to protection against the virus.

Last month, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Florida) signed a law stipulating that proof of a previous coronavirus diagnosis was enough to satisfy federal rules on vaccines, erroneously claiming that recognizing “natural immunity” was a “science-based approach.” At least two other states — West Virginia and Arkansas — have passed similar laws.

But evidence suggests that this is a dangerous strategy. Although individuals that were previously infected with COVID generally have some level of immunity against the virus, these levels of immunity are not consistent compared to the protection that comes from vaccines. Immunity from previous coronavirus infections wears off over time, meaning that even if someone already contracted the virus, getting vaccinated still ensures added protection.

One Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study found that unvaccinated adults who were previously diagnosed with the virus were five times more likely to be reinfected than those who had coronavirus and still received their Moderna or Pfizer shots. Because the Omicron variant comes with a higher likelihood of reinfection, health experts are recommending that everyone get vaccinated and boosted — even those who have already had coronavirus.

“This is not like getting measles back in March. If you had measles back in March, you’re probably going to be immune now, but that’s not the true thing for COVID-19,” said Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.