A State Department whistleblower who was fired on Friday evening had been looking into whether Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had abused his powers of office by ordering department employees to carry out personal tasks for him — including walking his dog, picking up his dry-cleaning, and making dinner reservations for his wife and himself, among other errands.
House officials received information about Inspector General Steve Linick’s firing following his sudden removal from the State Department late last week. President Donald Trump, in explaining Linick’s termination, said it was necessary to have “the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as Inspectors General,” implying that Linick had lost his trust.
Many lawmakers on Capitol Hill, including members of the Republican Party, were skeptical of Trump’s rationale. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who serves as co-chair of the Whistleblower Protection Caucus in Congress, decried the president’s explanation.
“A general lack of confidence is simply not sufficient” grounds for firing an inspector general, Grassley said.
Beyond being demonstrative of using his office in an inappropriate manner — utilizing taxpayer funds for personal business — Pompeo’s actions in recommending Linick’s firing to Trump may also be illegal for other reasons. According to U.S. statutes on obstruction of justice, any official who attempts to “influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law” is guilty of the crime. That includes firing officials if doing so is an attempt to impede an investigation they were conducting.
It’s possible that the current investigation into Pompeo’s alleged abuse of power won’t be looked at with the same amount of scrutiny, now that Linick is out: The departing inspector general is being replaced by Stephen Akard, an individual considered to be a strong ally of Vice President Mike Pence.
Linick himself was viewed as a nonpartisan official, serving in executive department roles across three different presidential administrations, two of which were Republican. Linick filed the May 2016 report that was highly critical of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over her email use while she served in the Obama administration.
Pompeo’s use of his office for personal reasons has been looked at in the past. Last summer, a separate whistleblower complaint suggested he had engaged in similar behavior, and in October, questions over whether his travels to Kansas, using State Department aircraft, were appropriate were raised, as Pompeo had been considering a run for Senate in that state around that time.
On Sunday, while appearing on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi discussed the legality of the controversial firing.
“The president has the right to fire any federal employee. But the fact is, if it looks like it is in retaliation for something that the IG, the inspector general, is doing, that could be unlawful,” Pelosi said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.