New reporting from The Washington Post details how the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) came to the decision to search former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence for government documents earlier this year.
The search of the Palm Beach, Florida, property, which took place in August, yielded more than 13,000 government documents that Trump had removed from the White House after his departure from office — including 103 documents that were marked as classified.
Since Trump left the White House in January 2021, more than 300 classified documents have been retrieved from Mar-a-Lago by various government agencies.
The reporting from the Post reveals that FBI officials were initially wary about conducting the August search, as it would be an unprecedented action against a former president. The FBI was also concerned about Trump’s presence at Mar-a-Lago and the possibility that officials would have to physically move him out of the way if he refused to allow them to execute a search warrant on the property.
Those worries were alleviated after it became clear that Trump, who spends less time at Mar-a-Lago in the summer due to the heat, would likely be at one of his properties in New Jersey or New York City while the search was being conducted.
The Post’s reporting showcases that the FBI ultimately got involved after arm-twisting from another government agency.
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), well aware that Trump had removed government documents from the White House, was involved in discussions with Trump’s lawyers for several months in 2021 to get the documents back. Trump only relented after NARA threatened to involve Congress in the matter. In January, the agency retrieved around 15 boxes of documents from the property.
After that retrieval, the Post reported, NARA noted that some of the documents were classified and contacted the FBI. But FBI officials hesitated to take further action, claiming it didn’t matter that Trump had the records because the government still had copies. The agency only agreed to pursue the matter after NARA informed them that the issue could pose risks to national security, citing Trump’s communications with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and documents regarding the nuclear weapon capabilities of a foreign nation.
The FBI reviewed the boxes NARA had taken in May, and engaged in conversations with Trump employees that “raised more alarms that the former president was, incredibly, still trying to hold onto classified documents and mislead the government,” the Post reported. A subpoena was executed in June to retrieve more materials.
In response to that subpoena, Trump lawyer Christina Bobb affirmed that a “diligent search” had been undertaken on the property, and that no additional classified documents remained. Over the course of the next several weeks, however, the FBI began to foster doubts about that statement.
The DOJ team serving the subpoena, for example, was not permitted to look inside containers where Trump’s boxes from the White House were kept. Mar-a-Lago employees also confided to the FBI that Trump had ordered them to move boxes from his storage locker to his private residence.
With more evidence mounting (including a surveillance video showing that boxes were indeed removed from the locker), the FBI concluded in July that Trump was likely still storing classified documents at Mar-a-Lago — an action that could warrant obstruction of justice, as Trump had previously denied that this was the case. The agency also speculated that Trump could be guilty of destroying government property, as it is well documented that Trump improperly disposed of records while he was president.
In order to discern whether or not the second charge was true, a search of the property was required, the agency concluded. But the FBI would only do so if Attorney General Merrick Garland signed off on the order, they told higher-ups at the DOJ. Senior DOJ officials agreed, and Garland eventually signed off on the order.
Days after the August search warrant was conducted, Garland made a public statement confirming that he had indeed authorized the search of the Trump-owned property. “The department does not take such a decision lightly,” Garland said at the time.
Trump has maintained since August that he has done nothing wrong and that he had previously declassified the documents — some with the designation of “top secret” — while he was in the White House. However, Trump has failed to produce evidence that any of the hundreds of documents he kept at Mar-a-Lago were declassified.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 242 new monthly donors in the next 2 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy