Washington – President Obama must be tempted to respond to his progressive critics with a quote from the old-school rapper Kool Moe Dee: “How ya like me now?”
Repeal of the military’s bigoted and anachronistic “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gays in the military — a campaign promise that seemed to be slipping out of reach — doesn’t fully mend the relationship between Obama and the Democratic Party’s liberal wing. But it’s a pretty terrific start.
Progressives needed a clear, unambiguous victory to ease the sting of those extended tax cuts for the rich. They got one Saturday with the Senate’s historic vote to end “don’t ask, don’t tell” — and Obama won vindication for the slow, patient, step-by-step approach that drove gay and lesbian activists crazy but ultimately produced a stunning result.
Administration officials believed from the beginning that getting the discriminatory policy repealed, and allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the armed forces, would require getting the Pentagon brass on board. The military leadership had to support the change, or at least accept it. Otherwise, repeal-minded members of Congress might balk at casting a vote that could be portrayed as somehow weakening America’s defense.
So the White House spent months demonstrating that Defense Secretary Robert Gates fully endorsed the end of “don’t ask, don’t tell” and that the service chiefs would implement the change. A key part of this painstaking strategy was the Pentagon’s 10-month study of the impact of eliminating the policy — which concluded, essentially, that there was likely to be no adverse impact at all.
The study included a military-wide survey, which found that two-thirds of service members believed ending the policy would have positive, mixed or neutral effects. Perhaps more significant was the study’s description of the experience of the British, Canadian and Australian militaries, which changed their rules and allowed gays and lesbians to serve openly. What happened? Nothing at all.
“Uniformly, these nations reported that they were aware of no units that had a degradation of cohesion or combat effectiveness, and that the presence of gay men and lesbians in combat units had not been raised as an issue by any of their units deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan,” the study reports. None of those other nations had problems with recruiting or retention, either. The change turned out to be a non-issue.
Opponents of ending “don’t ask, don’t tell,” including Sen. John McCain, had insisted that Congress not act until the Pentagon study was completed. When it finally came out, they promptly began moving the goalposts, demanding yet more hearings and testimony. It looked as if they were going to run out the clock and leave the issue for the new Congress, which will be far more conservative.
But then Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins came to the rescue.
I’ve been sharply critical of Lieberman in the past, and I suspect I’ll have occasion to be equally critical in the future. But on “don’t ask, don’t tell,” he was pure gold. Sometimes it seems as if Lieberman, who serves as an independent, delights in driving liberal Democrats crazy, but on social issues he still has a righteous sense of fairness and justice. His well-established record as a hawk on military matters gave him the credibility to push this change — and push it he did, even when all seemed lost.
And as for Collins, I’ve wondered how she can be called a “moderate” when she reliably stands with the archconservative, down-with-the-president GOP leadership in the Senate, especially on important procedural votes. But she was brave and principled on “don’t ask,” and by linking arms with Lieberman she allowed seven other Republicans to cast their votes on the correct side of history.
Now that Congress has acted, the military will move with caution to implement the change. Judging by what has happened in other countries that took this step, however, the process will probably move much faster than anyone expects. A year from now, we’ll all be wondering what the big deal was.
For gays and lesbians currently serving in the military, this doesn’t mean they necessarily have to make public their sexuality. It just means that soon they won’t have to fear being discharged for being who they are.
And for President Obama and the left, this is an important milestone — a reminder that even in dysfunctional Washington, what Sarah Palin derided as “that hopey-changey stuff” can still produce real hope and change.
Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy