Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation.
Journalist 1: “Did you see those protesters outside? There were some really wild signs they were waving around.”
Journalist 2: “Apparently the people want to hear how the candidates would substantially cut military spending.”
Journalist 3: “No—that is a non starter—they both want to increase military spending.”
Journalist 1: “Yes—and there are some people that want them to debate how to break up the too big to fail bank.”
Journalist 3: “Again- smell the coffee people. No difference between them there.”
Journalist 2: “What about breaking up the big media companies?”
Journalist 1: “Are you crazy? That is how we got this gig.”
Journalist 3: “Exactly.”
Journalist 2: “Should we ask them to debate the restrictions on liberty and the invasions of personal privacy?”
Journalist 1: “Well isn’t trampling on the Constitution justified by the war on terror?”
Journalist 3: “It’s doesn’t matter—they both agree on it.”
Journalist 2: “Should we have them talk about the outsourcing of jobs and tax avoidance by multinational corporations?”
Journalist 1: “Who do you think is sponsoring this debate?
Journalist 3: “And candidates? And our networks?”
Journalist 2: “I guess we should get the appearance of a different point of view in here.”
Journalist 1: “With leaders of the two parties co-chairing the debates? That is never going to happen.”
Journalist 3: “It clearly seems to be two parties with one owner.”
Journalist 2: “Well my concern, from the perspective of television ratings, is how do we make this interesting when there really isn’t much difference between them?”
Journalist 3: “Stick with the social distraction topics. We’ve been talking about that for 30 years. Sex and sexuality—and that is always a good with viewers for ratings.”
Journalist 1: “Exactly: gay marriage, abortion,, pedophilia, birth control”
Journalist 2: “and don’t forget legitimate rape.”
Journalist 3: “Oh, good one, we can spend at least 15 minutes on legitimate rate alone.”
The Man With The Crown: “If you want to change the direction and future of this country then we need a different point of view. The two candidates are not going to be talking about the real issues: exploding debt, unfair taxation, two standards of justice, and corporate control of what used to be our democracy. If you want to see these and other issues fixed : Occupy the debates.”
An urgent appeal for your support: 48 Hours to raise $21,000
Truthout relies on individual donations to publish independent journalism, free from political and corporate influence. In fact, we’re almost entirely funded by readers like you.
Unfortunately, donations are down. At a moment when independent journalism is urgently needed, we are struggling to meet our operational costs due to increasing political censorship.
Truthout may end this month in the red without additional help, so we’ve launched a fundraiser. We have 48 hours to hit our $21,000 goal. Please make a tax-deductible one-time or monthly donation if you can.