The Department of Justice (DOJ) has requested a judge to compel a lawyer for former President Donald Trump to testify before a grand jury regarding the investigation into his removal of government documents and their improper retention at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.
In doing so, the department explains in its briefing that they believe Trump used his lawyer’s services in committing a crime.
According to sources with knowledge of the DOJ’s filing, investigators are reportedly interested in knowing what Trump has said to Evan Corcoran, the lawyer in question, regarding his handling of government documents, many of which were marked classified. The former president had held on to the documents that should have gone to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) after his departure from the White House.
NARA spent the entirety of 2021 and most of 2022 painstakingly attempting to get those records back, with Trump’s lawyers during that time refusing to cooperate. In the spring of last year, the agency sought the DOJ’s help in retrieving the documents, at which point, the justice department issued a subpoena last June demanding, in part, that Trump ensure no more classified documents remained in his possession.
Corcoran was the lawyer who drafted an affidavit at that time attesting that Trump and his legal team had performed a diligent search of his property and determined he no longer had classified material in his possession. In fact, Trump actually had more than 100 such documents still at Mar-a-Lago until August, when the FBI conducted a search of the property and retrieved them.
Ordinarily, conversations between Trump and Corcoran would be protected under the attorney-client privilege. But in this latest court filing, the Justice Department alleges that Trump used Corcoran in furtherance of a crime, which removes such protections, a legal term known as the “crime-fraud” exception.
The motion is the most explicit statement yet from the DOJ stating that they believe Trump engaged in criminal activity with regards to the government documents he had in his possession.
Corcoran has testified before the grand jury before, doing so most recently just a few days ago. But he has refused to answer some questions posed to him, citing attorney-client privileges he has with Trump.
It’s unclear what those questions were, or whether they or other queries are why special counsel Jack Smith filed the motion to compel Corcoran to divulge more information beyond what has already been said. The motion itself is under seal, likely viewable only by investigators, Trump’s lawyers, the grand jury and the judge in question.
It’s unknown, too, on what basis the DOJ believes it can compel Corcoran to testify, or whether investigators believe he also committed an illegal act. Attempts to employ the crime-fraud exception do not necessarily mean that an investigation believes the lawyer in question committed a crime — a lawyer doesn’t have to be a co-conspirator in an action for the exception to be utilized, as a lawyer may undertake certain actions on behalf of a client without knowing that doing so is helping to aid in criminal behavior.
While the details of the crime Trump may have committed are unknown, sources with knowledge of the Justice Department’s filing have indicated it has to do with attempts by him to obstruct the DOJ’s and NARA’s work to retrieve the documents in his possession. “The crime-fraud argument principally concerns the same evidence of obstruction as raised in the search warrant affidavit,” The Guardian’s Hugo Lowell tweeted.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.