The Department of Justice (DOJ) is urging a federal judge to hold former President Donald Trump’s legal team in contempt of court over their failure to adhere to a subpoena that was issued earlier this year.
The subpoena, which was issued in May, required Trump to turn over all documents marked as classified that he improperly removed from the White House after his departure from the presidency, and for his legal counsel to affirm that no additional classified documents remained in his possession.
A lawyer for Trump had signed such an affirmation in June, but the DOJ later found evidence that the former president still had a significant number of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, Florida, leading to an unannounced FBI search of the property in August.
Now, in part because no member of Trump’s legal team will affirm that he no longer has such documents, the DOJ is urging U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell to hold Trump’s team in contempt of court for failing to comply with the subpoena order.
According to some reports, the primary reason that Trump’s legal team is refusing to comply with the subpoena is that nobody wants to be designated as Trump’s custodian of records, as they could potentially be held legally responsible if more classified documents are found later on. Indeed, the DOJ has said that it believes Trump is still hiding materials, and just this week, two more classified documents that Trump had taken from the White House were found in a storage facility near Mar-a-Lago.
It’s unclear if the contempt request came before or after those documents were found.
A spokesperson for Trump has decried the DOJ’s calls for his lawyers to be held in contempt of court, saying that the former president and his legal counsel “continue to cooperate and be transparent” in the DOJ’s investigation. That assertion contradicts the known timeline of events since Trump left the White House, however.
When Trump left office in January 2021, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) tried to get Trump to return documents that agency officials knew he had taken. Trump refused to comply with their requests for almost a year, only relenting late in 2021, when the agency threatened to involve Congress in the matter.
In January 2022, after NARA retrieved some of the records from Mar-a-Lago, officials alerted the Justice Department that some of the documents were marked as classified. The DOJ filed a subpoena in May, which it executed in June, demanding that Trump turn over all classified documents he had taken from the White House and affirm that no additional materials were in his possession, which a lawyer did on his behalf.
When video surveillance and other evidence indicated that the former president was still keeping classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, the DOJ obtained a warrant to search the property, finding more than 100 additional documents in Trump’s possession, including in his personal living quarters.
If Judge Howell agrees with the DOJ’s assertion that Trump’s legal team should be held in contempt of court, Trump and his lawyers will likely be subject to some form of sanction, potentially in the form of a fine.
Some legal experts believe that the DOJ’s request is a strong indication that Trump may face additional charges in the future.
“This just reached a whole new level of seriousness,” said Ryan Goodman, a former special counsel for the Department of Defense, noting that the contempt request “adds significantly to the likelihood of indictments.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.