The Department of Justice (DOJ) is appealing a ruling by a federal judge that ordered a special master to examine government records that were retrieved from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate last month.
The department is also asking for an immediate but partial stay while the appeals process plays out.
Many legal scholars condemned Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling earlier this week to halt the investigators’ examination of those documents, saying that she was legitimizing arguments made by Trump’s lawyers that he had executive privilege protections even though he is no longer president. In the appeal, the DOJ says that Trump “does not and could not assert that he owns or has any possessory interest in classified records.”
Even if the court were to entertain such a claim, the briefing states, executive privilege claims on government documents are often overruled when there is a compelling stake requiring them to be examined.
“Supreme Court precedent makes clear that any possible assertion of privilege that [Trump] might attempt to make over the classified records would be overcome by the government’s ‘demonstrated, specific need’ for that evidence,” the DOJ said. “Among other things, the classified records are the very subject of the government’s ongoing investigation.”
While the appeal is in motion, the DOJ has requested that Cannon issue a partial stay of her ruling so that investigators can resume examination of the classified documents that Trump had hidden at his Palm Beach, Florida, residence. The Justice Department is not requesting the stay be placed on non-classified items, but says that it must be able to resume its work for national security purposes.
If a stay is not granted by next week, the DOJ said it will ask for a stay from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Cannon’s original order from earlier this week stated that, while the DOJ couldn’t continue examining those documents, a separate assessment from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence could continue. In the DOJ’s briefing on Thursday, it asserted that their inquiry and that assessment were intertwined.
Cannon’s order “[frustrates] the government’s ability to conduct an effective national security risk assessment and classification review and could preclude the government from taking necessary remedial steps in light of that review — risking irreparable harm to our national security and intelligence interests,” the DOJ brief said.
Legal experts said the department’s strategy could be successful, even though the appeal will be heading to the conservative-leaning 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
It’s “quite likely that even a conservative panel would grant” a stay, based on the DOJ’s motion, Harry Litman, a journalist and former U.S. attorney, said on Twitter.
“The limited ‘ask’ is a decent strategy, I would think,” said Orin Kerr, law professor at the University of California, Berkeley. “Cannon didn’t read like a compromising judge in her prior order, but she might grant this. And if she doesn’t, it becomes all the more headscratching and sets up a better appeal for DOJ in the 11th Circuit.”
The DOJ presented additional arguments that lifting Cannon’s order was warranted, including noting the possibility that Trump may have more documents in his possession. Prosecutors warned that investigators may not have retrieved the totality of government documents that Trump removed from the White House upon his departure. Cannon’s ruling would make it difficult to retrieve those documents if they’re out there, the DOJ argued.
“The injunction against using classified records in the criminal investigation could impede efforts to identify the existence of any additional classified records that are not being properly stored — which presents the potential for ongoing risk to national security,” the DOJ said.
More than 300 classified documents have been retrieved from Mar-a-Lago since the start of 2022, according to reports. The retrieval process has been an arduous one — despite Trump’s claims that he has been cooperative, the former president only allowed some documents to be retrieved in January after the National Archives threatened to alert Congress that he had them in his possession.
After that initial retrieval, the National Archives discovered that some of the documents were highly classified in nature and alerted the DOJ. The department subpoenaed Trump to return all remaining classified documents in June and required him to affirm that all the documents had been removed from the estate.
A search warrant was executed at Mar-a-Lago in early August after evidence surfaced that more classified government material was being kept on the property. FBI agents removed more than 11,000 government documents during that search alone, including more than 100 documents that were classified.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.