Skip to content Skip to footer

Deregulation Taskforce Targeted Building Standards Before Grenfell Tower Blaze

A government-backed initiative to cut “red tape” after Brexit was looking to reduce the “burden” of EU building regulations.

A government-backed initiative to cut ‘red tape’ after Brexit was looking to reduce the ‘burden’ of EU building regulations just weeks before the disaster at Grenfell Tower, according to leaked documents obtained by Energydesk.

Rules including EU directives covering energy efficiency and fire safety standards were being discussed with industry and other stakeholders on June 14 — the very day of the tragedy, which claimed at least 79 lives.

A policy briefing produced by lobbying firm Hanbury Strategy for the Red Tape Initiative, a cross-party project chaired by Conservative MP Sir Oliver Letwin and until recently involved Michael Gove, lists five EU building regulations that could be amended or repealed after Brexit.

The list includes the EU’s Construction Products Regulation, which sets standards for construction materials traded across the EU such as cladding; it also puts fire safety at the heart of its ‘basic requirements for construction works.’

The Energy Efficiency Directive, the latest version of which the UK is lobbying to weaken at an EU level, and the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive also feature in the document as potentially ‘burdensome’ laws.

Hanbury Strategy is a political PR and research firm founded last year by Vote Leave’s head of communication Paul Stephenson and David Cameron’s ex-aide Ameet Gill; it recently recruited Theresa May’s former press secretary Lizzie Loudon.

The Red Tape Initiative is one of their few known clients.

Nick Tyrone, Director General of the Red Tape Initiative, told Energydesk: “We hired Hanbury to do us a ‘first look’ at what possible regulation from the EU might be relevant to the sector.

“The one they did for us had a wide range of items, most of which the sectoral panel rejected as items to discuss any further.

“This is what we expected of the process and is no fault of Hanbury’s — it is hard to know what the sector’s demands will be beforehand.”

He said the purpose of the project was “to find things that would find cross-party and cross-spectrum support” and that it is “not looking to cover anything controversial that would fail to gain such support, such as health & safety, employment rights or immigration.”

Hanbury Strategy declined to comment.

The Document

The briefing, obtained as part of a joint investigation with Friends of the Earth, is written on Hanbury letterhead and entitled ‘The EU’s Impact on the UK Housing and Construction.’

The document’s metadata dates it to May 10th of this year, and suggests it was co-authored by Alex Hackett, a researcher at the Red Tape Initiative who used to work for climate and eurosceptic MP Bill Cash.

The paper spotlights 5 key EU laws — Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, Construction Products Regulation (2011), Energy Efficiency Directive, Mortgage Credit Directive, EU Construction and Demolition Waste Protocol — and provides a column with ‘examples of UK criticism.’

In that column it refers to a Daily Telegraph column written by climate and eurosceptic Christopher Booker that describes the Construction Productions Regulation as “red-tape folly.”

The document then provides what it calls a ‘Brief critique of EU Housing and Construction Red Tape’ in which it says building and housing regulations have “been identified as a cause for concern” and cost councils and housing developers millions.

It closes by offering a glimpse at its ‘Next Steps’ which boil down to providing more in-depth analyses of the costs of EU red tape, and the potential savings of cutting it.

Tyrone said “the only [law] from the list we are actually taking forward into the next stage of the process being the Mortgage Credit Directive, something which can have an adverse affect on people lower down the housing ladder.”

Read the briefing here.

Brexit

The Red Tape Initiative was launched back in April with the purpose of creating a consensus on which regulations could be removed once the UK leaves the EU.

Its funders are not public, and are referred to simply as “business donors.”

Upon introducing the project, its chairman Sir Oliver Letwin said housebuilding would be one of three priority areas to be targeted in the deregulatory drive.

Letwin said they were planning to launch around 10 inquiries to seek views on what EU regulations could be jettisoned.

He also said Business Secretary Greg Clark wrote to the initiative, offering the cooperation of his department.

Tyrone described the project as “looking to locate both the EU directives and regulations that businesses find cumbersome as well as the ones they feel we cannot do without, in league with our main stakeholders, which include the TUC, the CBI, the FSB, the IOD and the British Chamber of Commerce.”

He added: “We convene meetings with people from each relevant sector to find out what regulations are needed or not needed. A representative from Unite the Union attends each one, as does a representative from the Green sector.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy