Skip to content Skip to footer
Deficit Commission Moves the Goalpost, Disses Leading Progressive Member
Rep. Jan Schakowsky

Deficit Commission Moves the Goalpost, Disses Leading Progressive Member

Rep. Jan Schakowsky

Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., says that as of this morning she had not been shown the latest proposal of the White House deficit commission, even as she says it is being “shopped around” by its co-chairs in an effort to get the support of a simple majority of its 18 members—not the support of 14 members as was its original goal.

Schakowsky confirmed this shift in an interview with after giving a private briefing to members of the Tuesday Group, a meeting of progressive organization leaders convened by the Campaign for America’s Future.

The deficit commission—formally known as the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform—was scheduled to hold a public meeting today in advance of its planned release of its recommendations Wednesday, but the meeting was abruptly canceled. Instead, its co-chairs, Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, were tweaking the deficit reduction plan they made public earlier this month, which includes proposals to cut Social Security benefits, Medicare and Medicaid, and other key programs.

Let Truthout send our best stories to your inbox every day, for free.

When the commission was created by President Obama, its charge was to come up with a set of recommendations that would be endorsed by 14 of its members. Those recommendations would then be sent to Congress for an up-or-down vote.
“Now I think their more modest goal is to get 10 members to endorse it” so that Simpson, a Republican, and Bowles, a conservative Democrat, can claim bipartisan support, Schakowsky said.

Schakowsky has released her own deficit-reduction plan, which does not cut Social Security or other human needs programs but tackles excessive spending in other areas, such as the military budget. Elements of Schakowsky’s plan were adopted by the Citizens’ Commission on Jobs, Deficits and America’s Economic Future, which released its report formally today.

Briefly, we wanted to update you on where Truthout stands this month.

To be brutally honest, Truthout is behind on our fundraising goals for the year. There are a lot of reasons why. We’re dealing with broad trends in our industry, trends that have led publications like Vice, BuzzFeed, and National Geographic to make painful cuts. Everyone is feeling the squeeze of inflation. And despite its lasting importance, news readership is declining.

To ensure we stay out of the red by the end of the year, we have a long way to go. Our future is threatened.

We’ve stayed online over two decades thanks to the support of our readers. Because you believe in the power of our work, share our transformative stories, and give to keep us going strong, we know we can make it through this tough moment.

We’ve launched a campaign to raise $44,000 in the next 7 days. Please consider making a donation today.