An agreement appears to have been reached between Democrats and Republicans on the formation of a 9/11-style commission to investigate the events of the January 6 breach of the Capitol. But not some — including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-California) — are not yet on board with the plan.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) and Rep. John Katko (R-New York), the chair and ranking member, respectively, of the House Homeland Security Committee, announced the deal on Friday. The committee plans to pass legislation, which will be voted on in the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives, that will establish a 10-member commission to examine “the facts and circumstances of the January 6th attack on the Capitol as well as the influencing factors that may have provoked the attack on our democracy.”
Five members of the commission will be selected by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-California) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York), with the remaining five being selected by McCarthy and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), ensuring an equal number of Democrats and Republicans to be tasked with taking part in the inquiry.
“It is imperative that we seek the truth of what happened on January 6 with an independent, bipartisan 9/11-type Commission to examine and report upon the facts, causes and security relating to the terrorist mob attack,” Pelosi said in response to the bipartisan deal being reached.
Yet in spite of the breakthrough deal, McCarthy expressed hesitancy, and didn’t state whether he backed the deal yet or not. “I haven’t looked all the way through it,” he said, adding that he wanted an inquiry that included other events beyond the January 6 breach of the Capitol. McConnell has similarly expressed a desire for issues besides the January 6 attack to be examined in the inquiry.
Prior to the deal being reached, Republicans had demanded that the commission also investigate demonstrations and uprisings over the summer involving the Movement for Black Lives, even though those events had nothing to do with the attempt by a mob of loyalists to former President Donald Trump to halt the certification of the Electoral College in January.
Dozens of Trump supporters, upset that Congress was about to certify the 2020 presidential election win by Joe Biden, forced their way into the building, resulting in five individuals dying and hundreds of others being injured.
Trump’s comments earlier on January 6, in which he encouraged his supporters to go to Congress to express their contempt (adding that they’d “never take back our country with weakness”), were seen by many as provoking the violence that was seen. Trump was impeached weeks later, with the Senate failing to convict him, though a majority of senators did vote in favor of his indictment.
It’s likely, given the scope of the commission’s duties, that Trump’s involvement in the day’s events, as well as his encouraging his supporters to come to Washington D.C. that day, will receive a deep examination.
The commission’s formation does not technically need McCarthy’s endorsement — if it can pass the House Homeland Security Committee, it will reach the House floor for a full vote, where the Democrat-controlled chamber is expected to support it. Less clear is how much support the commission might get in the Senate, where its formation could be blocked by a filibuster if it doesn’t have the support of at least 10 Republicans.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.