It is pathetic and even laughable to hear American leaders, and the leaders of the other Western democracies in Europe, cautioning that Egypt’s revolution needs to move slowly, as they call for a “transition” government that would be gently guided to elections by the very man, Omar Suleiman, who for years has headed the dreaded Mukhabarat, the Egyptian secret police, all under the protective umbrella of the Egyptian military.
What is this nonsense?
Did America’s revolutionary government have a slow transition to democracy? Did America’s revolutionaries sign the Declaration of Independence and then hand over the reins of government to a general from the British Army to oversee things as they prepared for elections? No. They immediately set up a democratic system, even in the midst of a bitter war for independence. Did the African National Congress turn to a general from the South African military to run a transition government in South Africa when they finally ousted the Apartheid regime in that country? No, they held an election, and went on to rule as the elected majority. When the People Power revolution in the Philippines toppled the Marcos dictatorship after a generation of autocratic and brutal martial law law, did the people turn to the country’s military and ask it to run the country for a transition year to democracy? No, of course not! They held a snap election and elected the widow, Corazon Aquino, wife of the martyred democracy activist Benigno Aquino.
Democracies don’t need “transitions” run by military rulers and hold-over tyrants. These are tactics designed to subvert, delay and even prevent true popular rule.
How tragic, sad and outrageous to hear our own political leaders, like Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama, calling for a period of interim rule—either under the hated dictator Hosni Mubarak himself, or under his hated enforcer, Suleiman. Is this what the young people who have already defended, with their blood, the idea of a truly free, democratic Egypt, were struggling, and even dying, for? Of course not!
How many times have we heard that the vast army of 100 million unemployed, uneducated young people in the Middle East, including Egypt, is a vast “breeding ground” for terrorism, as if these young people were just some species of deadly mosquito larvae. And yet, here these young people are, in Tunisia, in Egypt, in Yemen, in Algeria, in Gaza , in Iraq, and even perhaps in Syria and Saudi Arabia, engaging not in terror, but in peaceful if militant protest to demand what we in the West take for granted: freedom and a voice in their own destiny.
How insulting for us in America—we who cannot even name three or four cities in Egypt, who don’t bother to vote in elections, and who readily equate Arab with terrorist — to imply that these brave protesters “may not be ready” for democracy, adopting the classic fall-back position that colonial, neocolonial and imperialist rulers have turned to for centuries.
Instead of getting in their way, instead of trying to work out behind-the-scenes deals with other would-be tyrants and generals as we help ease out the hated current rulers of these kleptocratic Middle Eastern dictatorships, we should be helping these brave Middle Eastern and North African democracy activists to crush their tyrannical rulers and drive them out of power entirely.
America has fallen a long way from those heady days in the late 18th Century, when that celebrated American revolutionary tribune Tom Paine was declaring that America’s revolution could become the inspiration for a new and better, more humane society around the world. “We have it in our power to begin the world over again. A situation, similar to the present, hath not happened since the days of Noah until now,” he wrote.
Today, our leaders and government actively support tyranny (witness the provision, as part of America’s military aid package to Egypt, of tear gas canisters used against the democracy activists in Liberation Square), urge delay when they find they cannot stop the tide of rebellion, and then exert economic, diplomatic and covert efforts to try to foil or water down efforts to establish a truly democratic government. Even our special envoy, supposedly sent to broker a deal to usher in democracy, former US Egypt ambassador Frank Wisner, turns out to be simply another crook on the take. His lawfirm in Washington, DC, Patton Boggs, is dictator Mubarak’s legal agent in the US. It also represents the interests in the US of the Egyptian military. This creep is our tribune of freedom?
Should the US succeed in its efforts to block these grass-roots rebellions by the young people of the Middle East we should not be surprised if at least some of them, instead of trying to emulate us, turn into our most bitter enemies.
It’s what Tom Paine would have done.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.