The US Army on Wednesday brought 22 new charges against Pfc. Bradley Manning, the soldier accused of leaking classified military and government documents to whistleblower web site WikiLeaks. Manning was arrested in May 2010 for transferring classified data onto his personal computer and disclosing classified information concerning the national defense.
The new charges include one count of “aiding the enemy,” a capital offense that is punishable by execution, although Manning's prosecutors have said they will likely seek life imprisonment without parole rather than the death penalty. Manning previously faced 52 years in prison.
“The new charges more accurately reflect the broad scope of the crimes that Manning is accused of committing,” said Capt. John Haberland, legal spokesman for the Military District of Washington. The Army did not specify who it meant by “the enemy.”
According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, a defendant who is convicted of “aiding the enemy” must have knowingly harbored or communicated with the enemy “either directly or indirectly.” Jon Shelburne, the clinic defense coordinator at the Roger Williams School of Law, said prosecutors might have difficulty showing what particular benefits any US enemies gained from the documents.
“The third element of the charges is the biggest problem. Is any information in this area that was made public … visible to the enemy?” Shelburne said during a teleconference Thursday with the Bradley Manning Advocacy Fund. “I don't know how they are going to show that.”
Also speaking during the call was Daniel Ellsberg, the former military analyst who, in 1971, released classified Pentagon documents detailing US political and military involvement in Vietnam.
“Our enemy is generally al Qaeda, and they want these wars to continue,” Ellsberg said. “The people who give comfort to the enemy are the people who sent troops there and are keeping the cost of the war from the people. Bradley Manning is acting in the interest of the United States and against the interest of our enemy al Qaeda.”
“There's a campaign here against whistleblowing that's actually unprecedented in legal terms,” Ellsberg said.
Manning is expected to remain in solitary confinement under a prevention of injury (POI) order until his court martial hearings begin. Manning's attorney, David Coombs, has previously said that the order goes against the recommendations of mental health professionals and is “unduly harsh or punitive in nature.”
“There was a point at which he was almost catatonic in nature,” said David House, a friend of Manning's who visited Quantico in January. House said the conditions reflect that the “US government wants him to crack ahead of his trial.”
The Pentagon called the allegations of mistreatment “blatantly false.”
The Quantico Marine Corps base released a statement outlining Manning's treatment, including that he is “allowed to converse with other detainees as long as the conversation does not interfere with good order and discipline” and that he is “issued adequate bedding.”
“The notion that the Marines posted at Quantico's brig are anything but professional is absurd,” the statement said. “Not only are they responsible and accountable for the detainee's security, they are also responsible and accountable for the detainee's safety … A maximum custody detainee is able to receive the same privileges that a detainee classified as general population may receive.”
Shelburne agreed that Manning's treatment does not differ from that of the other Quantico prisoners awaiting court martial, but House and Coombs both denied that the Marine's description matched the reality of Manning's conditions.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.