At the Senate Armed Services Committee, when General David Petraeus said keeping U.S. troops in Afghanistan to fight was an “enduring” mission and that the July 2011 deadline for a troop withdrawal was flexible, it reminded me of what then-U.S. President George W. Bush claimed when he first announced the preemptive wars in Afghanistan and later Iraq. Some within the Bush Administration claimed the defeat of Kabul and Jalalabad and Baghdad would take only three to six weeks, perhaps at the most six months. More than ten years later, though, benchmarks and milestones for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have repeatedly changed, including the initial reasons and causes for their invasions.
Understandably, nations have to be flexible on the international front. But on the domestic front, is it possible to reach a point of being too flexible, especially with regards to elected leaders and military officials who are supposed to be held accountable for their foreign policy decisions and actions? In thinking about flexibility, the word appeasement – or the policy of giving concessions in exchange for peace – comes to mind, as does British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. In order to prevent war with Germany, he agreed to Adolf Hitler’s demands. Chamberlain gambled that by sacrificing part of Czechoslovakia, Hitler and the Nazis would be satisfied.
Instead, Hitler and the Nazis had many demands, which were backed by acts of aggression and an appetite for global domination. Can this lesson of appeasement and flexibility, then, be applied to a nation’s citizens and their official representatives, along with the democratic principles of checks and balances and the rights of assembling and petitioning? Can citizens, to their own peril, become overly flexible and appeasing towards ongoing wars and military occupations?
Click here to get Truthout stories like this one sent straight to your inbox, 365 days a year.
In fact, Senator Dianne Feinstein agreed that the July 2011 deadline to start withdrawing troops from Afghanistan should be dependent on requests by the military. Still, civilian President Barack Obama has hinted at revising the end of the U.S.-Afghanistan War (as he did the U.S.-Iraqi War), if Petraeus asks him to do so. Israel, too, has just announced there was no chance a Palestinian state would be established in the next two years, or by 2012. How much longer will people in Israeli- and U.S.-occupied territories like Gaza, the West Bank, Iraq, and Afghanistan have to wait to be free from large standing armies and enduring military missions?
When he spoke about the possibility of a free Palestinian state, Israel’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said, “One can dream and imagine, but we are far from reaching understandings and an agreement.” From the United States to Afghanistan and Iraq, from Israel to Palestine, how much longer should conscientious citizens practice appeasement and the politics of flexibility? How many times should leaders be permitted to change their goals, or generals given their demands? When does a citizen’s flexibility and appeasement scorn and mock a real “peace with honor” and “peace in our time”? At what point do such policies threaten liberties, or pose a greater risk to democratic ideals?
At some point, doesn’t a peoples’ dream to end war (and future conflicts already planned) or to finally establish an independent state need to become a reality?
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy