The U.S. State Department on Tuesday condemned a pair of high-ranking Israeli officials for suggesting that Gaza’s Palestinian population should be permanently evicted from their territory — a sentiment that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reportedly expressed in private.
But critics said the State Department’s outraged reaction to recent comments by Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich rings hollow given that the Biden administration continues to provide weaponry and diplomatic cover for Israel’s relentless assault on the Gaza Strip, which has killed tens of thousands of people and internally displaced 90% of the enclave’s population in less than three months.
“This is what the U.S. has done for more than 40 years on Israel-Palestine,” Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, wrote in response to the State Department. “Enable and fund Israeli policies that ultimately lead to Israel’s annexation of Palestinian lands, while publicly opposing and condemning the logical outcome of the very policies the U.S. funds and enables.”
In a statement released late Tuesday afternoon, State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said the Biden administration “rejects” Smotrich and Ben-Gvir’s remarks “advocating for the resettlement of Palestinians outside of Gaza.”
“This rhetoric is inflammatory and irresponsible,” said Miller. “We have been told repeatedly and consistently by the government of Israel, including by the prime minister, that such statements do not reflect the policy of the Israeli government. They should stop immediately.”
United Nations experts and human rights groups have been warning since the early stages of Israel’s latest attack on Gaza that the Israeli government could be pursuing a repeat — on a larger scale — of the 1948 Nakba, during which more than 750,000 Palestinians were expelled from their homes and lands. Israel’s agriculture minister has referred to the ongoing Gaza assault as “Nakba 2023,” and elected Israeli officials have repeatedly called for the mass transfer of Gaza’s Palestinian population.
The Times of Israel reported Wednesday that “Israeli officials have held clandestine talks with the African nation of Congo and several others for the potential acceptance of Gaza emigrants.”
During a November call with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi, U.S. President Joe Biden expressed that “under no circumstances will the United States permit the forced relocation of Palestinians from Gaza or the West Bank,” according to a White House readout of the conversation.
But the administration has done nothing substantive to ensure that the Israeli military does not pursue the mass, forcible, and permanent displacement of Gazans — which would be a war crime under international law.
In its recent request for billions of dollars in additional military aid for Israel, the White House asks Congress to approve funding that “may be used to meet evolving programming replacements outside of Gaza,” a provision that human rights groups warned would facilitate the forced transfer of Palestinians out of the Gaza Strip.
Agnes Callamard, the secretary-general of Amnesty International, said Wednesday that the Biden administration’s attempt to claim “moral high grounds” while simultaneously obstructing the international push for a cease-fire and selling lethal weaponry to Israel is “cynical and cannot work.”
“And speaking of ‘resettlement of Palestinians outside Gaza’ is misleading,” she added. “Given the context, it’s likely to be forced deportation.”
Just days before its denunciation of Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, the U.S. State Department announced that — for the second time since October — it had bypassed congressional oversight to approve a $147.5 million arms sale to Israel. The latest sale includes 155mm artillery shells, weaponry that human rights groups have specifically warned the Pentagon not to provide to the Israeli military.
“In Gaza, one of the world’s most densely populated places, 155mm artillery shells are inherently indiscriminate,” a coalition of groups wrote in a November letter to U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. “These munitions are unguided and have a high error radius, often landing 25 meters away from the intended target. Upon impact, 155mm shells expel 2,000 sharp metal fragments in every direction, risking injury, death, and permanent disability to civilians within 300 meters of the blast.”
“155mm artillery shells do not serve legitimate defense needs and pose a grave risk to civilians,” the groups added.
In a social media post on Tuesday, U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) called the Biden administration’s decision to circumvent congressional review of the arms sale “morally indefensible.”
“How can we expect Netanyahu’s government to stop the mass killing of civilians and calls for ethnic cleansing,” she asked, “if we continue to supply the weapons used to carry it out?”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.