Tuesday night’s Democratic debate was a CNN-engineered center-right ambush of Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren that was so ham-fisted in its conception and execution, it could have been drawn up by Donald Trump himself.
“Is Bernie Sanders Too Extreme?” was an actual discussion topic. Zero-polling candidates like Rep. John Delaney and Sen. Amy Klobuchar were encouraged to take swipes at Medicare for All, student debt forgiveness, and other big-box ideas put forth by the two progressive frontrunners.
Many of the questions put forth by CNN were specifically engineered to allow the “moderate” low/no-polling candidates an opportunity to directly attack Warren and Sanders: “Senator Whoever, you once said that Bernie Sanders wants to roll into the future on rails lubricated with newborn kitten blood. Do you stand by that statement?” An exaggeration, but not by much.
CNN gave Delaney an inordinate amount of time because he was the loudest and pushiest of the anti-progressives clustered on the debate stage. Hoping to make his mark early, Delaney threw Walter Mondale and Mike Dukakis in Sanders and Warren’s face with his opening statement. He was aggressively wrong from start to finish, the leader of the back of the pack for one night by dint of volume.
In the end, however, all he and the others did was bait the bear. Sens. Warren and Sanders rose up righteous before every challenge and batted the “moderate” also-rans around the room.
It did not take long for Sanders and Warren to figure out what they were up against. The prevailing “wisdom” among the pundits who populate networks like CNN is that these two will soon have to crawl into Thunderdome together and fight to the death. That was not last night. When Delaney went after Sanders by using right-wing arguments against Medicare for All, Warren came barreling to his defense.
“We are the Democrats,” insisted Warren. “We are not about trying to take away health care from anyone. That’s what the Republicans are trying to do, and we should stop using Republican talking points in order to talk with each other about how to best provide that healthcare.”
Delaney’s time in the butter churn did not end there. At one point, it was revealed that he is worth $65 million, putting him $15 million within the margin of Warren’s two-cents wealth tax plan. When Warren heard this, she smiled and rubbed her hands together like a chef surveying a fine repast before laying out all the pro-people programs she could fund with a tiny slice of John Delaney’s fortune.
The towering moment of the night also came at Delaney’s expense. After he unspooled yet another ill-reasoned center-right argument, Warren gave it to him with hot mustard. “I don’t understand why anybody goes to all the trouble of running for president of the United States just to talk about what we really can’t do and shouldn’t fight for,” she proclaimed. The audience went wild as Delaney grinned sheepishly while blinking his unsettling eyes.
Senator Sanders had his own battles to wage with CNN’s chosen trio of moderators, specifically Jake Tapper. When Tapper tried to frame Sanders’s Medicare for All plan as a giant tax increase, Sanders landed on him with both feet. “Jake, your question is a Republican talking point,” he clapped back. “And by the way, the health care industry will be advertising on this program with that talking point.” Zing.
Sanders was not entirely sharp during the first debate in June, but last night, he gave one of his best performances out of both of his campaigns. After Rep. Tim Ryan, another member of last night’s “moderate” chorus, tried to tell Sanders he didn’t know what was in his own health care bill, Sanders delivered a line that will live on in Bernie lore right next to the bird that landed on his podium in 2016. “I do know it,” Sanders thundered. “I wrote the damn bill!”
“When progressive ideas are cogently aired before millions of viewers,” I wrote last month, “the ‘centrist’ establishment and their ‘moderate’ mainstream media allies will rally furiously to try and convince everyone how terrifying those ideas are.”
This was never more evident than last night. CNN spent the hours before the debate seeding the clouds with anti-progressive arguments that all boiled down to “these lefty ideas can’t win.” During the debate, the moderators allowed the “centrists” to run wild with a blizzard of damaging and discredited conservative myths and proposals.
Over the course of the evening, Mayor Pete Buttigieg and several of his center-right cohorts came out against decriminalizing migration. Sen. Amy Klobuchar bragged about “bringing metro people with me,” which was strange Minnesota code for Black voters. All of them were given many long minutes to try to trash the Green New Deal while paying dusty lip service to the dangers of climate disruption. Ryan praised Trump’s ruinous China tariff policy. Delaney championed the ghastly Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal before offering kind words to Ronald Reagan. Gov. Steve Bullock managed to be smarmy even as he refused to take a first-strike nuclear attack by the U.S. “off the table.”
Yet even with the deck stacked and the utterly atrocious debate format, frontrunners Sanders and Warren showed why they have earned their frontrunner status. CNN has not yet gotten the memo, but the senators from Massachusetts and Vermont clearly see how the failed “centrist” arguments of the past are a losing proposition in 2020.
They are not the only ones who see it. “Candidates who look like they are cautious, modulating, have their foot on the brake are missing the moment,” advises veteran Democratic poll guru Stan Greenberg. “The country is so far away from where it was under Bill Clinton. People are desperate for government to show it can do big things.” Greenberg made his bones in politics by practicing exactly this kind of tepid campaigning in Bill Clinton’s election war rooms. The fact that even he is now making this argument is very worthy of note.
It was a surprisingly clarifying evening. CNN was looking to burn down the campaigns of frontrunners Warren and Sanders with a “Progressives v. Centrists” brawl, and tilted the table in favor of the “centrists” so severely it is a wonder the moderators’ microphones didn’t slide onto the floor. It did not work out the way they hoped.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.