The claims were described as a “bombshell” and “colored with a bit of Macbeth.”
On September 9, the US Chamber of Commerce’s Legal Newsline cited an unnamed source to claim that the criminal probe into Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker was a personal vendetta that can be traced back to the wife of Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm.
The Chamber publication cited an unnamed source for the allegation that Chisholm “had personal motivations for his investigation,” since Chisholm’s wife was a public school teacher and union member who “frequently cried when discussing the topic of the union disbanding” as a result of Walker’s signature Act 10 legislation.
It was an ugly and personal attack that spread like wildfire across the right-wing news media.
Turns out that the unnamed source, described in the Chamber publication as a “former staff prosecutor” and “longtime Chisholm subordinate,” was actually just an unpaid intern who previously made death threats to the prosecutor and his family. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Dan Bice broke the news that the source for the Chamber story is Michael Lutz, a former Milwaukee police officer who obtained his law license less than four years ago and worked, without pay, for Chisholm’s office for only five-and-a-half months in 2011 filling out grant applications.
Even if the source were credible, the story doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. A “weeping wife” doesn’t explain why the non-partisan Government Accountability Board — a panel of nonpartisan retired judges appointed by the governor and confirmed by the legislature — voted unanimously to approve the probe or why Republican prosecutors from across the state found that the investigation had legal and factual merit or why an experienced Republican federal prosecutor decided to spearhead the complex investigation. And it defies the laws of time and space to believe that Chisholm’s motivation for an investigation that started in 2009 was to retaliate against Walker for introducing Act 10 in 2011.
The Chamber has skin in the game. Its Wisconsin affiliate, the Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, is one of the groups under investigation in the “John Doe” criminal campaign finance investigation, where Chisholm and other prosecutors are looking into alleged coordination between the Walker campaign and third-party dark money groups during the recall elections. According to prosecutors, WMC was involved in campaign-related conference calls with the governor and in 2012 received $2.5 million from Wisconsin Club for Growth, a nonprofit led by a top Walker advisor.
The Chamber apparently thinks that “foul is fair,” but that is not the way we have done it in Wisconsin. Attacks on the families of public figures have always been condemned by people of good faith.
The US Chamber and Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce should apologize for their smear.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.