Ukraine is under a “leaky” ceasefire as of last week, but the underlying problems will go unresolved until the United States, European Union and Russia stop talking past each other.
Conflict in Ukraine began with Russia’s concern that another former Soviet republic would fall into NATO’s hands. In a caricatured geopolitical rendition of “Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus,” East and West find themselves talking past each other with neither willing to listen to the other in translation.
For Russia, NATO expansion represents an existential threat as NATO encroached into the former Soviet bloc and then the former USSR itself, despite promises by U.S. Secretary of State James Baker in 1990 that it would not. The U.S. and Europe see NATO as defensive. Russia sees it as encircling. NATO sees itself as a benign alliance of democracies.
Meanwhile, Russia’s answer to that, cueing singer Jim Morrison, is one of “the future’s uncertain and the end is always near.” Russia previously observed a Germany that switched from democracy to an apocalyptic fascist regime overnight. And, while that was long ago, given the massive loss of life, World War II still holds a central place in Russia’s consciousness, as did the Civil War for many decades in the United States.
Presidents Bill Clinton and later George W. Bush ignored Baker’s pledge and expanded NATO anyway. George Kennan, the dean of Cold War U.S. diplomats (and a Milwaukee native), strongly cautioned against the spread of the alliance eastward. In his last years, Kennan declared in The New York Times that “Expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era,” one likely “to restore the atmosphere of the Cold War to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking.” Such foreshadowing should have been heeded.
Vladimir Putin is no democrat, but he’s also no extremist of the Vladimir Zhirinovsky or even Alexander Dugin variety committed to gathering Russian speakers into a “Greater Russia.” But he could be if pushed. Putin sees himself as the CEO of a country run as a corporation. This should give one simultaneously both pause and relief, as it hints at his authoritarian tendencies, but also his disinterest in ruinous adventures motivated by ideology.
Putin is a pragmatist seeking to advance Russian economic and geopolitical power. He has been a partner in the war on terror and previously hinted at wanting to join NATO. Rebuffed, that rebuke proved costly as it set him on a course of independent action.
Europe and the U.S., by contrast, express their normative view that all countries are entitled to self-determination. For them, Russia’s concerns are anchored in a past that no longer exists. Moreover, East/Central Europe had its own unpleasant experience with a neighbor: the USSR. Russia needs to recognize that. Yet, if Europe and the U.S. can resist the temptation to exercise their right to admit new entrants to NATO, they might yet find an accommodation with Russia that benefits all, especially Ukraine.
As Mark Twain intoned, “history does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” At World War I’s centennial, we seem perilously close to sounding out a new history that rhymes with the years 1914-1945. Europe and the U.S. can best help by halting NATO expansion and working with Russia to develop Ukraine together.
The smart answer for Ukraine is “Finlandization,” not NATO. Caught between East and West, and once part of the Russian Empire and later an enemy of the USSR, after World War II Finland opted to develop its economy and security by engaging both East and West as a Rosetta Stone of sorts for both. The result was peace and prosperity in one of the great success stories of the 20th century.
A Ukraine that finds cooperation with both Europe and Russia might just untie its Gordian Knot and become the great success of our century.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy